(no title)
iak8god | 2 years ago
University media offices seem to think it's their job to misinterpret and exaggerate scientific findings in whatever way will draw the most clicks to their press release.
I've only had a chance to skim, but there's all kinds of weirdness here. In "Study 3" they measure 171 college students' social media use on Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook, ignoring TikTok, which those subjects probably use more than all the others combined.
InSteady|2 years ago
soudiere|2 years ago
What's real interesting is their 2021 paper, showing the effect is mediated by high-self esteem (as measured by the 7 Item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474231/
Researcher goes along with this insane press release that does not mention self-esteem mediating it, why? Because they have an agenda.
If you want to figure it out, follow the money. Who is funding their research? I would not be terribly surprised to find a pharma pipeline with a drug that reduces c-reactive protein. Social media addiction isn't in the DSM-5 yet, but once it is you know there's a market for a drug to address it.
iak8god|2 years ago
Ignoring TikTok for any reason in 2021-2022 is a huge mistake. Once I saw that, I decided I'm not interested in their findings.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
Terr_|2 years ago
Relevant comic: https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174
iak8god|2 years ago
Yes, but in the ~15 years since this came out, University PR have closed the gap between their work and that of cable news :)