(no title)
jy1 | 2 years ago
Scenario: The XYZ Algorithm
Let's say you are a software developer working on an extensive library that deals with data processing. You come across a small, but particularly efficient algorithm developed by Company A, which they've shared on their blog. This algorithm, called the XYZ Algorithm, is explicitly mentioned to be freely usable but retains the copyright to Company A.
You decide to use this XYZ Algorithm as a component within your larger library. You integrate it as-is, without modifying the original code of the XYZ Algorithm.
Implications:
Rights on the XYZ Algorithm: Even though you've integrated the XYZ Algorithm into your library, Company A retains the copyright on that specific algorithm. If they've specified particular licensing terms or conditions for use (like attribution), you'd have to abide by them.
Rights on the Entire Library: The rest of your library, which you developed independently, remains your intellectual property. Company A's copyright doesn't extend to the whole library, just the specific portion that constitutes the XYZ Algorithm.
Distribution and Licensing: If you decide to distribute or sell your library:
You'd have to ensure you comply with any licensing terms or conditions attached to the XYZ Algorithm. For the parts of the library you own, you can choose any licensing model you like.
Just because Company A can stop you from commercializing your entire Library, does not mean they own rights to your entire Library.
ClumsyPilot|2 years ago
But a painting of Yoda is a different Depiction of the same character. There are no subsets. It's the general image and idea of the character that is Disney's property.
jy1|2 years ago
There is no 100% painting of Yoda, with exception of perfectly copying an existing work.
You can a take a photo of Yoda at Disneyland. Disney still cant take your photo and slap it on t-shirts to sell without your permission. (It doesnt mean you can either)