(no title)
JimtheCoder | 2 years ago
At the same time, not knowing in advance what the content will be is sort of a killer for me...on-demand has a bit of social proof through reviews and comments, whereas live audio is sort of a crap shoot.
JimtheCoder | 2 years ago
At the same time, not knowing in advance what the content will be is sort of a killer for me...on-demand has a bit of social proof through reviews and comments, whereas live audio is sort of a crap shoot.
jjulius|2 years ago
https://kexp.org/
>... whereas live audio is sort of a crap shoot.
Crap shoots can be fun, though!
dmonitor|2 years ago
NotSuspicious|2 years ago
ComputerGuru|2 years ago
Agreed but with heavy emphasis on "occasionally."
I grew up listening to NPR. It's not the same any more - and not just compared to way back when but even when compared to a mere ten years ago. The amount of (relatively subpar) content that is purely picked and broadcast for the purpose of showcasing <instance of behavior or existence of person meeting certain carefully selected bullet points determined by the political policy of the broadcasting station> makes the signal-to-noise ratio for non-agenda-sharing listeners rather poor.
It's a real shame because there are such treasures on there that drown in the sea of subpar content picked only because it serves the agenda of the station in question, and doubly-so because the national NPR w/ independently run regional stations model is absolutely terrific for promoting local journalism.
mcpackieh|2 years ago
rat87|2 years ago
UncleOxidant|2 years ago
progrus|2 years ago
I can’t even begin to imagine how one can have a positive reaction to that gruel.