(no title)
rfmc | 2 years ago
Checked out the N++ repo, and saw it's got 2.1k open issues and 7.2k closed ones, and this is from an org that seems to be just one or two devs. How's that even sustainable?
I've got zero experience in maintaining big open-source projects, but those numbers would freak me out, to say the least. Way past what I'd call manageable.
flohofwoe|2 years ago
For instance: how many of those are actual bugs versus feature requests versus just questions.
Of the actual bugs, how many of those are actually critical and need fixing?
As long as incoming tickets are looked at and prioritized, and those tickets that come out on top are fixed in a timely manner all is good.
The team also just might not close any 'stale' issues that never made it to the top of the priority queue (some projects automatically close stale tickets after 1 month of inactivity, which is arguably worse).
FWIW the PR page is in much better shape: 11 Open vs 3664 Closed.
pc86|2 years ago
bombcar|2 years ago
delfinom|2 years ago
The answer? Just maintain the project as the hobby it started as. Open source is provided without warranty and users are more than free to use the provided binaries for their convenience as-is or learn to compile to contribute fixes.
psychphysic|2 years ago
It's killed more useful projects than it's ever benefitted.
0x000xca0xfe|2 years ago
I fixed an issue myself that got on my nerve and was already sitting in the bugtracker for years, so they are more like helpful forum posts.