(no title)
s_tec
|
2 years ago
This seems like a good idea. We have used gas taxes for a long time, but electric cars don't pay this tax. If we want to pay for roads based on how much people use them, we will need to switch to something other than gas taxes. Odometer readings could work, but it's not clear how to get honest readings. Weight isn't perfect, but it seems like a less-bad options than the others.
stetrain|2 years ago
Also fun was that this remained full price during the year that my state suspended its gas tax for economic relief due to high gas prices.
Weight and mileage based taxation absolutely makes sense, since road damage increases with the 4th power of axle load. But matching those taxes to damage caused means heavy trucks will pay the vast majority of tax, since they do the vast majority of damage. This may be unpopular with Amazon.
hibikir|2 years ago
fodkodrasz|2 years ago
That gives 200 USD -> 183 € -> 508 liter -> 134 gallon.
My fairly outdated small but somewhat sporty car with high consumption (9l/100km rounded up) would go 5600 kms from that. Here EVs have to pay no excise and no parking fees and no yearly engine-power based taxes for their cars, while ICEs must, based on age, environmental category and engine power...
Compared to that you still pay some taxes, still that amount is negligible to the taxes some pay for ordinary ICE cars.
londons_explore|2 years ago
You don't need to get perfect readings from everyone. If you tax 99% of people, that's fine.
ARandomerDude|2 years ago
Ah yes, the old have the police collect more information on you idea. What could go wrong?
tomschlick|2 years ago
If those people are from out of state, the tax revenue would go to their home state instead of the state they created the road wear and tear on.
SoftTalker|2 years ago
repiret|2 years ago
Adding an odometer only inspection requirement to jurisdictions that don’t currently have an inspection wouldn’t be terribly onerous. You could make a device that plugs into ODBII and reads the odometer and VIN and reports it to the state, it would take less than a minute of labor per reading. Combine that with some policies that encourage oil and lube shops to get the device and provide the reading at no extra cost when you’re doing an oil change, and most people wouldn’t see any increased costs or inconvenience.
vsareto|2 years ago
dontlaugh|2 years ago
Taxing by mass seems much simpler.
McDyver|2 years ago
If someone has a car registered in Luxembourg and drives mainly around France, Germany, Belgium, it would be difficult to define where the tax should go
paulmd|2 years ago