(no title)
wavesounds | 2 years ago
Teachers should be very careful using a vanilla LLM for education without some kinds of extra guardrails or extra verification.
wavesounds | 2 years ago
Teachers should be very careful using a vanilla LLM for education without some kinds of extra guardrails or extra verification.
chaxor|2 years ago
GNNs (for which LLMs are a subclass of) have a potential to be optimized in such a way that all the knowledge contained within them remains as parsimonious as possible. This is not the case for a human reading some internet article for which they have not gained extensive context within the field.
There are plenty of people that strongly believe in strange ideas that were taught to them by some 4th grade teacher that was never corrected over their life.
While you're statements are correct in this miniscule snapshot of time, it's exceedingly short-sighted to assert that language modeling is to be avoided due to some issues that exists this month, and disregard the clear future of improvements that will come very soon.
pixl97|2 years ago
csa|2 years ago
If you heard the bullshit that actual teachers say (both inside and outside of class), you would think that “1% hallucinations” would be a godsend.
Don’t get me wrong, some teachers are amazing and have a “hallucination rate” that is 0% or close to it (mainly by being willing to say they don’t know or they need to look something up), but these folks are the exceptions.
Education as a whole attracts a decidedly mediocre group of minds who sometimes (often?) develop god complexes.
raincole|2 years ago
jheriko|2 years ago
sebzim4500|2 years ago
cocoto|2 years ago
[deleted]