I don't see what this has to do with YC or how it is at all similar apart from trying to trade on the name.
What stops this turning into another oDesk type site?
Edit: I didn't read the part about the matchmaking.
Although if you are trying to appeal to a higher calibre of clients the website design probably needs to change, go with a more "prestige" feel rather than pictures of people slumped with laptops in coffeeshops.
Also ditch the "hacker" branding, this has too many wrong implications in the mainstream.
Definitely - this is actually on purpose for the first phase, where we would rather focus on a small number of clients and hackers for whom it goes well, rather than trying to attract everyone who has something to outsource.
But, agreed, if we want to go beyond the types of clients who aren't scared of the word "hacker", we'll probably have to create a separate site for them.
I don't know for sure, but I would suspect that Facebook's description of "The Hacker Way" when they filed their IPO helped a bit to give it a positive connotation.
I don't have many customers who'd want to pay good consulting money to get hacking / hackers / hacks, to put together work that was hacked together, a hacky job.
Unless this is a site where you get bleeding edge proof of concepts built?
The word hack for a wider audience means someone who can't cut it.
Where am I coming from? Dictionary.com seems to sum up this one angle.
hack
1. a person, as an artist or writer, who exploits, for money, his or her creative ability or training in the production of dull, unimaginative, and trite work; one who produces banal and mediocre work in the hope of gaining commercial success in the arts: As a painter, he was little more than a hack.
2. a professional who renounces or surrenders individual independence, integrity, belief, etc., in return for money or other reward in the performance of a task normally thought of as involving a strong personal commitment: a political hack.
3. a writer who works on the staff of a publisher at a dull or routine task; someone who works as a literary drudge: He was one among the many hacks on Grub Street.
The other, less known, positive, meaning of hack* is only, largely known to the tech scene. Unless they are your market exclusively..
The feedback we've got around us and the posts on this thread, seem to agree on the fact that this is a clear branding issue, so we may reconsider our take on that one.
We preferred to start with something that would only try to appeal to clients who understand the meaning of "Hacker", as a sort of filter. And only introduce a different branding for clients later on, when we would want to extend the target audience. But it may be interesting to do some AB testing here, and see if we can get good clients without the Hacker branding too, from the start.
How will billing work for this on a practical level?
Let's say I've done a week's work, and I charge by the day. Do I sent an invoice to you guys, or directly to the client? Do you bill me for your 10% cut, or is that factored in to the price you quote to the client? Will, in fact, I end up with an invoice to pay to you guys?
UPDATE: I somehow missed the bit about payment guarantee on your website, but would still like to know how this works as far as the forms my company needs to send :)
You also need to consider the nightmare that is charging VAT in Europe. I'm based in Poland, and anyone I bill who is also based in Poland, consumer or business, gets charged VAT at 23%. If the client is based in another EU country, but is VAT registered, they're zero-rated. If the client is in the EU but is NOT VAT registered, I have to charge the 23% tax. Finally, for everyone else, it's zero-rated.
Now, I have no idea of the tax implications - if any - of the above when going through a third-party site such as Hacker Trade. Based of snippets I've read elsewhere (such as FastSpring's EU tax explanations on their website), I'm guessing that you might have to do some EU tax registration yourselves... but only if you're the one collecting money.
Interesting idea though, I've finally returned to full-time consulting and am building up my network, so this could be a real win for the likes of me :-)
We're still ironing out the details on that one, so take my answer with a grain of salt - it still needs to get confirmed by the accountant & the lawyer.
But, basically, it would likely be very similar to what you get on vworker for example - the client transfers the money into escrow, and get an invoice for it. The % cut of the platform is deducted from the amount put in escrow and transferred to the freelance. The % is taken into account for the quote, so that it's shared between the coder and the client.
And, yes, we've had to deal with European taxes too, so we're familiar with the tax mess. : ) I don't have all the details on that yet, but I'll post an update when we do.
In any case, if you're selected, we'll figure out the specifics of your situation, to make sure everything is by the book.
If you are calling yourself a freelancer, then you have the wrong mind-set. Treat your work like a real business. Brand your services. Whatever you do, don't call yourself a freelancer. You are missing out on the opportunity to present a much better image to your prospective clients.
Freelancer is bad, hacker is even worse. You might as well have thrown rock star and ninja on the front page as well.
Quote from the front page...
"Hackers can focus on code, and clients get peace of mind."
Sure, because these are the sorts of problems people who refer to themselves as freelancers or hackers have. If this service isn't taking care of marketing, accounting, budgeting, business strategy, etc. then the hackers can't just focus on code. If you need a service like this to give your clients peace of mind, then you probably shouldn't be doing client work.
If you guys really want to help connect people, then you should probably start by helping them get into the correct mind-set. Prospective clients aren't looking for hackers, they are looking for professionals.
ETA: This was a bit of a rant. So, I suppose I should offer something constructive. I think the service is fine, but I would change the message. I could see clients being turned off by the choice of wording. Also, you may want to provide different portals for clients and hackers / freelancers / ninja's / rock stars. The client doesn't care about all the benefits to the developer and doesn't need to see those details. Maybe a more simple "find talent" and "find work" page (like Elance) would be better?
Agreed on the message/positioning, as discussed in previous comments - we'll see if we can find a better branding, at least for the client side.
About learning to get the right mindset, we would definitely like to include people who are new to freelancing in the first batch - you're right in the fact that this is probably one of the most valuable aspects of our help for them, besides the matchmaking itself.
I'd like to hear more about your strategy for beating the cold-start problem. You'll need to ramp up both sides of your two-sided market to be of value to either side.
Our approach is to start really small - we only need a small number of hackers and clients to get started. This allows to be in a similar situation as an small agency - we don't need to match the audience of elance/vworker to make it work. The human/case by case approach requires more work for us, for a lower cut than what an agency would take, but with a different goal in mind for scaling.
We could actually have done the first batch by ourselves, with just clients and hackers that we know and are interested. But we thought it would work as a better validation to give a chance to HN readers to join - we're more likely to get a more diverse set of situations this way.
The advantage for those who will be in the first batch is the extra care and attention we'll dedicate on making it work for them. We'll all be learning from the experience - aside from guaranteeing a place on Hacker Trade in the future, it's also a good opportunity to shape what Hacker Trade will be, and ensure that you get what you need from it.
A few things.
(Disclosure: I'm a mobile dev/freelancer, been doing this own my own for a while with pretty good results)
1) I think the biggest issue is the cold-start problem discussed by another HNer below. Namely, while the copy sounds good and the coders in the photos seem trendy enough, do you actually have good clients? Selling promises about freelancing to either side plays to the ideal that we all want, but rarely does it work out that well.
2) How flexible are the payment / contractual terms? I usually see this as a negotiation with my clients which, if done successfully, improves the relationship. If there are disagreements about terms, is this service simply going to insist on the terms that benefit their interests?
3) Is the pre-project test work paid? What if I require at least some deposit on the overall project up-front?
4) Please don't spread misuse of the term hacker. You're trying to appeal to the coder-side of the demographic, but anyone serious should have no problem using a more professional term.
I'd consider signing up, but at this point it still does feel like another startup claiming to fix the problem with no guarantees of anything that different other than the best of intentions. No offense, but I've followed 2-3 companies like this so far and nothing's panned out anywhere near as well as traditional networking. I'm hopeful though, and definitely interested in hearing more about what you have to say.
1) Aside from the leads from our own network who have shown interest, we have got some good applications from clients already (even with the Hacker branding issue discussed below). So, even if we'll still have to go through the first batch to answer your question with a firm "yes", it's looking good.
Since we don't try to be big just yet, this is less of a concern for our first stage - if you get in, it's because we think we have a good match for you. Aside from the 5 minutes you would spend filling the application, you don't really have anything to lose to try.
2) Very flexible - if you and the client agree on something, we're willing to try it out. This is actually another reason for us to start small - to make sure that we can adapt quickly and match what works.
3) Yes, the test project is paid.
4) Duly noted - cf my answers on this topic below.
Good hackers don't need your services as badly as bad hackers do. If you focus on quality hackers, I think you'll need to drop your price.
Ten percent is reasonable if you provide a steady stream of work for hackers who don't have a clientbase. However, I have the impression that you're specifically trying to cater to gifted hackers, who presumably already have an existing clientbase or a robust network.
A lot of good hackers may have a good network and existing client base, but in our experience it's not always the case. You have good hackers who work in a cubicle because they don't want to tackle that part; hacker freelancers who don't want/like to do the necessary legwork to maintain a steady stream of clients...
Also, as mentioned below - even if you already have a good client base, applying allows you to extend your market - you can always evaluate the offers on a case per case basis, and see if the % cut is worth it. You get more options.
But you may have a point - it's quite possible that some client/hackers profiles will require less work from us than others.
A few questions / comments (as a prospective client):
1. Do you have any thoughts or guidelines as to project size? Any lower or upper limits? (I sometimes have projects as small as a few hours' work for someone with the right background -- say, integrating with a particular tool or API. I would love a way to find skilled freelancers for this type of task. AnyFu sounds like it might be aiming at this, but they've been stuck in "we'll notify you as soon as [we're] ready" for a while now.
2. How is the project price determined? Direct negotiation between client and contractor? Do you get involved (at least to make suggestions)? Is price determined before or after the matchup is made?
3. It would be nice to have a general notion of what sorts of expertise your contractors have (collectively). For instance, are you recruiting designers? Frontend developers? Backend developers? What technologies are best represented? Before writing up a project proposal, it would be nice to have an idea of whether I have some chance of finding a good match.
1. Small tasks are much easier to handle in that context. But that doesn't exclude bigger projects - we'll just make sure it is split into smaller tasks (the usual sprint/stories methodology of SCRUM usually helps a lot here)
2. We start by asking both parties what is their price/budget. This allows us to do a first sanity check on both sides, and then we use that information, along with the project description, to see who could agree on a price. We discuss a potential match with both parties - if both agree to discuss, they get to discuss the final price together.
3. True, it would certainly be useful. We have a good core set of skill currently in web development, games, Python/PHP/Node/JS - but that doesn't take into account the many candidatures from HN exposure today. We haven't had time to process them properly yet, but the set of expertise is much larger already. I'd say that, unless your project is extremely specific, we can probably find a matching skill set for you.
Very interesting problem to tackle. Only problem I see is how the incentive structure will work out. The YC process works because as a hacker, there is a huge monetary incentive(average YC statup is worth 22.4m) to apply. However, it's not clear to me how the incentives will work out with hackertrade, since most hackers already have plenty of paid work opportunities.
1) Yes, established hackers who already have plenty of clients and opportunities may not need the matchmaking. But it's also a way to extend the potential market, and get more choice & security - after all, you're never obliged to accept an offer, so there is nothing to lose to apply.
2) Some devs are good at delivering, but don't like/want the networking/business development aspect of finding clients. It's a way to minimize the amount of time spent on it, and focus on code instead.
Very cool idea! I'm wondering if it solves this problem that a lot of clients face- the client knows what they'd like, but have no clue as to what kind of coding is required to accomplish it. So when they look for freelancers, they don't know the alphabet soup of languages and end up connecting to people that might not be the best fit.
If you guys are acting as "matchmakers," you might want to specifically say that you can help people who don't know what they're looking for (if you offer that service). I've bookmarked you though, because finding good freelance talent is a real problem.
Yep, good point. Helping to figure out what's needed is an important aspect - it's one of the most tricky parts for people who are starting to contract online or don't have all the necessary technical background.
I think that there is a need in the market for a site like this, that focuses on quality. And avoids the problems of massified remote work sites, that end up full of silly projects, with lots of poor programmers spamming everything to death.
The presentation is right. The fee is appropriate for not too long gigs. But perhaps in the case of longer terms contracts, some other option could be offered.
It's a great idea and has potential to create value for both parties. Although the part where you say you guarantee the payments might be a little tricky when it involves transferring money across different countries. The client transfers the money to hackertrade, you hold the money and then transfer to the coder. It could be double-taxed and compromise the business cash-flow.
This part we didn't really innovate - that's how plateforms like elance or vWorker guarantee their payments. Taxes can be an headache, but nothing that hasn't been solved already.
Congrats on the launch! Very similar concept to my own project, Folyo (http://folyo.me). Pretty much exactly the same thing actually, except Folyo focuses exclusively on freelance designers.
EDIT: there is one difference, which is that Folyo takes a $100 fixed fee per project, not a cut of the budget.
Interesting idea. I respect that you are trying to match the client and the developers well, but the process you outlined seems to involve a lot of steps. Is there a way to simplify or automate portions of it? It also might be a challenge to be profitable charging 10% with the amount of back-and-forth you've proposed..
[+] [-] jiggy2011|14 years ago|reply
What stops this turning into another oDesk type site?
Edit: I didn't read the part about the matchmaking.
Although if you are trying to appeal to a higher calibre of clients the website design probably needs to change, go with a more "prestige" feel rather than pictures of people slumped with laptops in coffeeshops.
Also ditch the "hacker" branding, this has too many wrong implications in the mainstream.
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
But, agreed, if we want to go beyond the types of clients who aren't scared of the word "hacker", we'll probably have to create a separate site for them.
[+] [-] wauter|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] j45|14 years ago|reply
Unless this is a site where you get bleeding edge proof of concepts built?
The word hack for a wider audience means someone who can't cut it.
Where am I coming from? Dictionary.com seems to sum up this one angle.
hack
1. a person, as an artist or writer, who exploits, for money, his or her creative ability or training in the production of dull, unimaginative, and trite work; one who produces banal and mediocre work in the hope of gaining commercial success in the arts: As a painter, he was little more than a hack.
2. a professional who renounces or surrenders individual independence, integrity, belief, etc., in return for money or other reward in the performance of a task normally thought of as involving a strong personal commitment: a political hack.
3. a writer who works on the staff of a publisher at a dull or routine task; someone who works as a literary drudge: He was one among the many hacks on Grub Street.
The other, less known, positive, meaning of hack* is only, largely known to the tech scene. Unless they are your market exclusively..
0.02 :)
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
We preferred to start with something that would only try to appeal to clients who understand the meaning of "Hacker", as a sort of filter. And only introduce a different branding for clients later on, when we would want to extend the target audience. But it may be interesting to do some AB testing here, and see if we can get good clients without the Hacker branding too, from the start.
[+] [-] mootothemax|14 years ago|reply
Let's say I've done a week's work, and I charge by the day. Do I sent an invoice to you guys, or directly to the client? Do you bill me for your 10% cut, or is that factored in to the price you quote to the client? Will, in fact, I end up with an invoice to pay to you guys?
UPDATE: I somehow missed the bit about payment guarantee on your website, but would still like to know how this works as far as the forms my company needs to send :)
You also need to consider the nightmare that is charging VAT in Europe. I'm based in Poland, and anyone I bill who is also based in Poland, consumer or business, gets charged VAT at 23%. If the client is based in another EU country, but is VAT registered, they're zero-rated. If the client is in the EU but is NOT VAT registered, I have to charge the 23% tax. Finally, for everyone else, it's zero-rated.
Now, I have no idea of the tax implications - if any - of the above when going through a third-party site such as Hacker Trade. Based of snippets I've read elsewhere (such as FastSpring's EU tax explanations on their website), I'm guessing that you might have to do some EU tax registration yourselves... but only if you're the one collecting money.
Interesting idea though, I've finally returned to full-time consulting and am building up my network, so this could be a real win for the likes of me :-)
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
But, basically, it would likely be very similar to what you get on vworker for example - the client transfers the money into escrow, and get an invoice for it. The % cut of the platform is deducted from the amount put in escrow and transferred to the freelance. The % is taken into account for the quote, so that it's shared between the coder and the client.
And, yes, we've had to deal with European taxes too, so we're familiar with the tax mess. : ) I don't have all the details on that yet, but I'll post an update when we do.
In any case, if you're selected, we'll figure out the specifics of your situation, to make sure everything is by the book.
[+] [-] gexla|14 years ago|reply
Freelancer is bad, hacker is even worse. You might as well have thrown rock star and ninja on the front page as well.
Quote from the front page...
"Hackers can focus on code, and clients get peace of mind."
Sure, because these are the sorts of problems people who refer to themselves as freelancers or hackers have. If this service isn't taking care of marketing, accounting, budgeting, business strategy, etc. then the hackers can't just focus on code. If you need a service like this to give your clients peace of mind, then you probably shouldn't be doing client work.
If you guys really want to help connect people, then you should probably start by helping them get into the correct mind-set. Prospective clients aren't looking for hackers, they are looking for professionals.
ETA: This was a bit of a rant. So, I suppose I should offer something constructive. I think the service is fine, but I would change the message. I could see clients being turned off by the choice of wording. Also, you may want to provide different portals for clients and hackers / freelancers / ninja's / rock stars. The client doesn't care about all the benefits to the developer and doesn't need to see those details. Maybe a more simple "find talent" and "find work" page (like Elance) would be better?
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
About learning to get the right mindset, we would definitely like to include people who are new to freelancing in the first batch - you're right in the fact that this is probably one of the most valuable aspects of our help for them, besides the matchmaking itself.
[+] [-] kjhughes|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
Our approach is to start really small - we only need a small number of hackers and clients to get started. This allows to be in a similar situation as an small agency - we don't need to match the audience of elance/vworker to make it work. The human/case by case approach requires more work for us, for a lower cut than what an agency would take, but with a different goal in mind for scaling.
We could actually have done the first batch by ourselves, with just clients and hackers that we know and are interested. But we thought it would work as a better validation to give a chance to HN readers to join - we're more likely to get a more diverse set of situations this way.
The advantage for those who will be in the first batch is the extra care and attention we'll dedicate on making it work for them. We'll all be learning from the experience - aside from guaranteeing a place on Hacker Trade in the future, it's also a good opportunity to shape what Hacker Trade will be, and ensure that you get what you need from it.
[+] [-] Gorbzel|14 years ago|reply
1) I think the biggest issue is the cold-start problem discussed by another HNer below. Namely, while the copy sounds good and the coders in the photos seem trendy enough, do you actually have good clients? Selling promises about freelancing to either side plays to the ideal that we all want, but rarely does it work out that well. 2) How flexible are the payment / contractual terms? I usually see this as a negotiation with my clients which, if done successfully, improves the relationship. If there are disagreements about terms, is this service simply going to insist on the terms that benefit their interests? 3) Is the pre-project test work paid? What if I require at least some deposit on the overall project up-front? 4) Please don't spread misuse of the term hacker. You're trying to appeal to the coder-side of the demographic, but anyone serious should have no problem using a more professional term.
I'd consider signing up, but at this point it still does feel like another startup claiming to fix the problem with no guarantees of anything that different other than the best of intentions. No offense, but I've followed 2-3 companies like this so far and nothing's panned out anywhere near as well as traditional networking. I'm hopeful though, and definitely interested in hearing more about what you have to say.
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
Since we don't try to be big just yet, this is less of a concern for our first stage - if you get in, it's because we think we have a good match for you. Aside from the 5 minutes you would spend filling the application, you don't really have anything to lose to try.
2) Very flexible - if you and the client agree on something, we're willing to try it out. This is actually another reason for us to start small - to make sure that we can adapt quickly and match what works.
3) Yes, the test project is paid.
4) Duly noted - cf my answers on this topic below.
[+] [-] snikolic|14 years ago|reply
Ten percent is reasonable if you provide a steady stream of work for hackers who don't have a clientbase. However, I have the impression that you're specifically trying to cater to gifted hackers, who presumably already have an existing clientbase or a robust network.
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
Also, as mentioned below - even if you already have a good client base, applying allows you to extend your market - you can always evaluate the offers on a case per case basis, and see if the % cut is worth it. You get more options.
But you may have a point - it's quite possible that some client/hackers profiles will require less work from us than others.
[+] [-] snewman|14 years ago|reply
1. Do you have any thoughts or guidelines as to project size? Any lower or upper limits? (I sometimes have projects as small as a few hours' work for someone with the right background -- say, integrating with a particular tool or API. I would love a way to find skilled freelancers for this type of task. AnyFu sounds like it might be aiming at this, but they've been stuck in "we'll notify you as soon as [we're] ready" for a while now.
2. How is the project price determined? Direct negotiation between client and contractor? Do you get involved (at least to make suggestions)? Is price determined before or after the matchup is made?
3. It would be nice to have a general notion of what sorts of expertise your contractors have (collectively). For instance, are you recruiting designers? Frontend developers? Backend developers? What technologies are best represented? Before writing up a project proposal, it would be nice to have an idea of whether I have some chance of finding a good match.
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
2. We start by asking both parties what is their price/budget. This allows us to do a first sanity check on both sides, and then we use that information, along with the project description, to see who could agree on a price. We discuss a potential match with both parties - if both agree to discuss, they get to discuss the final price together.
3. True, it would certainly be useful. We have a good core set of skill currently in web development, games, Python/PHP/Node/JS - but that doesn't take into account the many candidatures from HN exposure today. We haven't had time to process them properly yet, but the set of expertise is much larger already. I'd say that, unless your project is extremely specific, we can probably find a matching skill set for you.
[+] [-] Ecio78|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] bobrenjc93|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
1) Yes, established hackers who already have plenty of clients and opportunities may not need the matchmaking. But it's also a way to extend the potential market, and get more choice & security - after all, you're never obliged to accept an offer, so there is nothing to lose to apply.
2) Some devs are good at delivering, but don't like/want the networking/business development aspect of finding clients. It's a way to minimize the amount of time spent on it, and focus on code instead.
[+] [-] warpspeed|14 years ago|reply
If you guys are acting as "matchmakers," you might want to specifically say that you can help people who don't know what they're looking for (if you offer that service). I've bookmarked you though, because finding good freelance talent is a real problem.
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] oozbot|14 years ago|reply
I think that there is a need in the market for a site like this, that focuses on quality. And avoids the problems of massified remote work sites, that end up full of silly projects, with lots of poor programmers spamming everything to death.
The presentation is right. The fee is appropriate for not too long gigs. But perhaps in the case of longer terms contracts, some other option could be offered.
Hope that it goes well.
[+] [-] moraesgp|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] antoviaque|14 years ago|reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escrow
[+] [-] sgdesign|14 years ago|reply
EDIT: there is one difference, which is that Folyo takes a $100 fixed fee per project, not a cut of the budget.
[+] [-] egallardo|14 years ago|reply