(no title)
nhance | 2 years ago
It astounds me that there aren't more people interested in cutting off the constant telemetry and to be honest it wouldn't surprise me if the car refuses to operate correctly when I do figure out where it's at and pull it.
pgeorgi|2 years ago
I know of a car (Renault in EU) whose SIM access is broken somehow that still works fine, just can't call home. No guarantee that every car will handle it gracefully, but at least some regions don't seem to mandate any enforcement if that module happens to "break".
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
joezydeco|2 years ago
b112|2 years ago
EG if the cell tower was very close.
Was fine after I used a resistor to turn that power into mild heat.
Sander_Marechal|2 years ago
ben-schaaf|2 years ago
yardie|2 years ago
mindslight|2 years ago
FWIW I've got no actual experience, but given the general slowness with which the car industry moves I would guess the cell modem is just a module hanging off one of the CAN buses, receiving telemetry broadcast by other modules and injecting/interrogating commands when requested (like modern OBD2 ports). I suppose it could also be part of something like the gauge cluster that links different buses as well (at least on Hondas) but with the modular way cars seem to work I'd guess it's not likely.
I'd try to track down a copy of the factory service manual for your model. Those have seem to have gotten pretty thin these days too in favor of computer-based documentation, but it should at least help you work out how things are generally connected. (No point to the readily-available Haynes manual though. Those are apparently garbage)
noman-land|2 years ago
orev|2 years ago
bityard|2 years ago
vorpalhex|2 years ago
Could use an SDR or emf reader. It'll take a while since you need to catch a cellular keep alive but otherwise should be fine.
wil421|2 years ago
I have a 2019 Grand Cherokee and I think we both have the updated head unit. Let me know if anything works.
[1] https://www.jeepgarage.org/threads/uaq-antenna-connections.2...
grecy|2 years ago
vuln|2 years ago
monkpit|2 years ago
swader999|2 years ago
delecti|2 years ago
catchnear4321|2 years ago
not strapping on tin foil hat, this likely isn’t some massive coordinated effort. it could be done “better.”
this is just making the most of the situation. at scale.
if you simplify the question, “Who wants to let their car manufacturer surveil them?” - the answer is also simple. very few hands are going to be raised.
most people don’t get the tl;dr - they drown in the firehose.
what isn’t out there is a friendly, accessible version of what you’re looking for - multi-manufacturer information on snipping the sensors, why and how, and what you lose in the exchange. if it is out there, it isn’t friendly enough to be readily found.
s3p|2 years ago
throw3747874747|2 years ago
loloquwowndueo|2 years ago
By comparison if your seat belts are all frayed and you don’t wear them anyway that’s on you, manufacturer sold you a car with seat belts in good condition and that as far as the “compliance” requirement goes.
chongli|2 years ago
justinclift|2 years ago
neurostimulant|2 years ago
PrimeMcFly|2 years ago
lost_tourist|2 years ago