Because it's internet drama that doesn't matter. Someone posted a video, someone got offended, twitter flame war ensues.
This continuing to be news would require that every time a godaddy ad is shown that we need 8 articles about it. If you don't like how godaddy advertises simply don't buy their product.
Argument invalid. If HN did not like the article, it would not be upvoted. If this was a trolololl debate happening then upvotes won't do much. If the trolololl debates got upvoted enough times, we'd get some calls for more Haskel/Erlang articles (actually I could really use a call for Clojure articles). HN is fairly well self-regulating.
Not deleted, flagged. Folks who think an article is not HN material or useful can click the 'flag' button, enough flags and the article is made 'dead' which drops it out of consideration for ranking.
Right. I mention that in the post, I guess I could have phrased the title better.
The larger question is "why was it flagged?" There was a lively discussion on the topic, and it seems very relevant to the startup scene. The fact that this topic would be considered "not worthy" of HN speaks volumes by itself.
More weirdness- this post was on the front page briefly, then immediately shot down to the fourth page, behind an entry that's 589 days old. Is HN just screwed up today?
[+] [-] fleitz|14 years ago|reply
This continuing to be news would require that every time a godaddy ad is shown that we need 8 articles about it. If you don't like how godaddy advertises simply don't buy their product.
[+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply
I'd say there is an interesting conversation to be had, as suggested by the interesting conversation being had before the entry was deleted.
[+] [-] dlikhten|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tessr|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] kaiju|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ChuckMcM|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply
The larger question is "why was it flagged?" There was a lively discussion on the topic, and it seems very relevant to the startup scene. The fact that this topic would be considered "not worthy" of HN speaks volumes by itself.
[+] [-] sycr|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wglb|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] ghurlman|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] untog|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] mmastrac|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] wglb|14 years ago|reply