When I showed up for double sessions freshman year, I found that the sizes of the shirts corresponded to the numbers. Even without rules about what number an interior lineman must wear, the big body positions just aren’t going to physically fit in jersey number three.
I've always associated single-digit numbers to "skill positions," especially speedsters like WRs, RBs, and CBs. If you're in the 50s and above, I'll assume you're one of the "big uglies" duking it out in the trenches.
> When we looked at the relationship between the ratings of size and slenderness and the numbers, [and] we did a very small range, like from 17 to 19, we see a very robust correlation."
It’s such a great proof at how absolutely fundamentally tragically terrible humans are at evaluating things consistently based on purely sense perception.
It reinforces my priors that human knowledge is Bayesian (we don’t just take in knowledge, we are constantly comparing it to a prior and updating that prior, but we aren’t aware of our own biases which can take a huge precedence over new information).
I wore "11" as a sophomore HS running back, then moved to "40" for my junior & senior years. I gained almost zero weight (or muscle), but I swear I looked GOOD with those skinny ones on my front & back.
I remember my teammates being extremely picky about which numbers they’d wear and I always caught grief for wearing #8 as a running back since it’s thought of as a QB number (Troy Aikman, Steve Young). In hindsight maybe they were on to something.
I think of it as a "bold" 9. Gretzky agreed it to be kinda synonymous with his favorite Howe's number 9. Yet it's 16 that Gretzky wanted at the time, instead of assigned 19...
I think all else being equal, numbers like xx, x0, and x (<10) are more desirable for perceived significance. If a player desires anything else it's presumably out of some personal significance to them (even if just 'the number I was randomly assigned on my first team').
This seems similar to observing that vertical and horizontal stripes on clothes (and the width of the stripes) can affect how one perceives a silhouette.
andtheboat|2 years ago
Context and history matter as this is the complete opposite for soccer:
- Smaller numbers go to the defenders and big guys
- Larger numbers are given to younger & academy player
- Numbers like 7, 9, 10, 8 & 6 all have a specific meaning on the pitch
So yeah, numbers matter, but so does everything else.
solids|2 years ago
dylan604|2 years ago
"Number 1 is Carragher. Number 2 is Carragher. Number 3 is Carragher.
We all dream of a team of Carraghers!"
couldn't resist
nostromo|2 years ago
lukas099|2 years ago
zimpenfish|2 years ago
blueberrychpstx|2 years ago
[deleted]
RandallBrown|2 years ago
Linemen are required to wear higher numbers so it's no surprise that people automatically associate higher numbers with bigger people.
singleshot_|2 years ago
the_snooze|2 years ago
kleinsch|2 years ago
> When we looked at the relationship between the ratings of size and slenderness and the numbers, [and] we did a very small range, like from 17 to 19, we see a very robust correlation."
AndrewKemendo|2 years ago
It’s such a great proof at how absolutely fundamentally tragically terrible humans are at evaluating things consistently based on purely sense perception.
goatlover|2 years ago
schneems|2 years ago
mud_dauber|2 years ago
Nicholas_C|2 years ago
TheRealPomax|2 years ago
cbsmith|2 years ago
zoomablemind|2 years ago
https://www.hockeyfeed.com/nhl-news/gretzky-tells-the-real-s...
SoftTalker|2 years ago
OJFord|2 years ago
lukas099|2 years ago
webel0|2 years ago
canjobear|2 years ago
m3kw9|2 years ago
mertd|2 years ago
lsmeducation|2 years ago
[deleted]
dang|2 years ago