A friend in grad. school would put obvious glaring errors in his preliminary drafts of write-ups so the prof's would then be happy to correct these, feel they'd done their work, and move on, avoiding any actual substantive criticisms requiring actual work on his part to fix.
sneak|2 years ago
https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2013/06/05/duck/
unethical_ban|2 years ago
So yeah, sometimes as we presented our security policies or documentation, we would highlight an existing problem for which we had a solution or proper executive backing to justify, so that when it was called out, we would haggle and then say "okay, let's fix that". Everyone had done their job.
Off-topic: I was blocked from reading that site using Proton's TX datacenters, but it worked as soon as I switched to Sweden.
Stop blocking VPNs, Rachel.
rbirkby|2 years ago
martincmartin|2 years ago
I was given that advice when preparing for my Ph.D. defense. :)
vidarh|2 years ago
Though I believe the technique has been given many other names as well.
itsoktocry|2 years ago
There are people that believe Elon can do no wrong and is always playing 8d chess.
b59831|2 years ago
[deleted]
ilamont|2 years ago
Had this happen during an audit very early in my working life - "where did this excess income come from?" The books I gave them were clean. Fortunately the accountant made an obvious math error that was easy for me to spot, and the next round went smoothly.
Or was it an error? Hmmm ...
qup|2 years ago
sidewndr46|2 years ago
Gibbon1|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
tetrep|2 years ago