top | item 37477177 (no title) axitanull | 2 years ago Open sources can have a restrictive license, just because a project doesn't use WTFPL doesn't mean it's not open source. discuss order hn newest dartos|2 years ago https://opensource.org/osd/According to the open source initiative, that’s exactly what it means.MIT license is not copy left like GPL, but it’s open source.The llama license is not.
dartos|2 years ago https://opensource.org/osd/According to the open source initiative, that’s exactly what it means.MIT license is not copy left like GPL, but it’s open source.The llama license is not.
dartos|2 years ago
According to the open source initiative, that’s exactly what it means.
MIT license is not copy left like GPL, but it’s open source.
The llama license is not.