(no title)
mikeyjk | 2 years ago
I don't think carbon dating can be used to extract DNA.
I also would have thought DNA would have degraded significantly over that period of time.
There are probably a thousand more reasons this is blatantly false, to those with scientific knowledge beyond my early highschool experiences.
It's bizarre and fascinating the Mexican government has entertained this.
kylebenzle|2 years ago
All that happened is some idiot Senator invited some idiot scammer to give a talk about his scam. I don't think they really had to "entertain" it and it has no legitimacy.
quantified|2 years ago
aradox66|2 years ago
Humans share ~60% DNA with fruit flies, so the reported ~70% similarity seems quite low for such a "quasi-human" figure.
Perhaps you could make a case that DNA retrieval from such an old sample would be corrupted. It does seem more like the figure is tuned by the exigencies of pop-sci click bait.
Anyways they shared the full sample online, so legit geneticists could potentially weigh in.
miohtama|2 years ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/genetics/comments/16hb5th/nhi_genom...
suzzer99|2 years ago