Survival is inherently selfish. Something has to die for you to live.
That something might be a plant or animal. As long as you _attempt_ to minimize the suffering of what you're consuming, then eating plants over animals isn't morally superior.
It also doesn't really matter if it's a cow, chicken or frog, as long as you're not making the animal suffer pointlessly.
I already said I agreed survival is justification for eating animals. But this is not survival, this is sport, because they have a choice to eat something other than animals and still thrive.
visiting your family is not nexessary for survival or sustenance. In fact your survival most likely implies the destruction of habit for other animals thru consumption/farming
shepherdjerred|2 years ago
That something might be a plant or animal. As long as you _attempt_ to minimize the suffering of what you're consuming, then eating plants over animals isn't morally superior.
It also doesn't really matter if it's a cow, chicken or frog, as long as you're not making the animal suffer pointlessly.
0daystock|2 years ago
the__alchemist|2 years ago
lemao9988|2 years ago