(no title)
joe-collins | 2 years ago
The only possible downside I see in this very thin reporting is the usual feel of ickiness some folks get out of an appeal to nature fallacy.
joe-collins | 2 years ago
The only possible downside I see in this very thin reporting is the usual feel of ickiness some folks get out of an appeal to nature fallacy.
Georgelemental|2 years ago
High blood cholesterol levels is a common health problem, but it doesn't follow that consuming too much cholesterol causes high blood cholesterol levels—it could be that the body can normally handle any amount of cholesterol/cholesterol precursor consumption within a wide range, but a dysfunction in the regulation mechanism results in health problems. And in fact, double-blind trials seem to support this theory:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.00000000000...
"Evidence from observational studies conducted in several countries generally does not indicate a significant association [of dietary cholesterol] with cardiovascular disease risk."
> An appeal to nature fallacy
The theory of natural selection predicts that human metabolism is best adapted to consuming food similar to what was available for most of our evolutionary history.
Kirby64|2 years ago
Nelkins|2 years ago