top | item 37573364

(no title)

amanj41 | 2 years ago

A little off topic, but may be beneficial to uppercase all of "Aids" to "AIDS" to avoid ambiguity

discuss

order

adrianmonk|2 years ago

To an American audience, yeah, it's definitely better in all caps.

However, The Economist is British, and sometimes in British English they capitalize acronyms that way. Only "true" (pronounceable) acronyms, though, so they'll write Nato ("nay toh") and BBC ("bee bee see").

pathartl|2 years ago

Clarifying what you mean, all acronyms are pronounceable, otherwise they're just a sparkling initialism.

edflsafoiewq|2 years ago

The article uses "AIDS". It's just the HN title mangler at work.

cglong|2 years ago

This was likely the HN title autoformatter at work. I knew what the title was trying to say, but I couldn't help but think of that South Park episode :)

irreticent|2 years ago

It also might be more accurate to not refer to AIDS as a virus. It is a syndrome caused by HIV. HIV is the virus.

dang|2 years ago

Fixed now.