top | item 37576653 (no title) TetraBeef | 2 years ago I think most of the companies saying they would pull out said they would because of the parts of the bill targeting end to end encryption.I thought they dropped that part of the bill, I may be mistaken though. discuss order hn newest Jigsy|2 years ago They said it wasn't currently feasible. Meaning they believe it will be (lol) years or decades down the line. cwales95|2 years ago Pretty much. I’m not sure if it got included but if it was feasibly possible they absolutely would — which is just as bad in my opinion. Lack of capability does not nullify intent. load replies (1) jacooper|2 years ago They didn'thttps://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/09/today-uk-parliament-un...
Jigsy|2 years ago They said it wasn't currently feasible. Meaning they believe it will be (lol) years or decades down the line. cwales95|2 years ago Pretty much. I’m not sure if it got included but if it was feasibly possible they absolutely would — which is just as bad in my opinion. Lack of capability does not nullify intent. load replies (1)
cwales95|2 years ago Pretty much. I’m not sure if it got included but if it was feasibly possible they absolutely would — which is just as bad in my opinion. Lack of capability does not nullify intent. load replies (1)
Jigsy|2 years ago
cwales95|2 years ago
jacooper|2 years ago
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/09/today-uk-parliament-un...