[housemusicfan]

Who made YouTube judge and jury?

Let's say, for the sake of argument, YouTube demonitized all Irish because they unilaterally decided they're all plonkers and they're a private company and they can do what they want. Because that's the level of absurdity here.

Nor do your examples hold water. This isn't a situation of "you were caught stealing paperclips on video". Rather, it's more a case of Sally the tart from accounting has accused you of fingering her in a pub toilet ten years ago when you were both drunk and now ten years later she decides she's upset so let's engage the digital lynch mob and proceed with ruining your life because we all know women never lie.

[voganmother42]

If you think the examples you are replying to are bad...your example...wow

And I am sure information wont matter to you...but just in case:

The majority of sexual assaults are not reported.

Somewhere between 2-10% of reports are false.

You are contributing to making it worse for victims.

You should be ashamed of yourself.

[housemusicfan]

10%?! 10% is huge. So we should assume presumption of guilt with a 10% error rate?

If 10% of all planes crashed, you would never set foot on one. For comparison, the chance of dying in a plane crash is 0%... to the 7th or 8th decimal place.

The people that should be ashamed are those making false accusations, and those dumb enough to believe them.

[lesuorac]

> Who made YouTube judge and jury?

Non-sequitor. YT does not need the power of a court decision to take this action. It's basically the same question of "Who made YouTube President"; it's irrelevant.

> Let's say, for the sake of argument, YouTube demonitized all Irish because they unilaterally decided they're all plonkers and they're a private company and they can do what they want. Because that's the level of absurdity here.

I mean YT could decide that your country isn't eligible for YT depending on local laws and block content. Which they do.

[gooseus]

Well, I assume Youtube and their community are the judges and juries of Youtube.

I am merely one humble judge and jurist of these comment threads, and I rule that your comment here is disgusting and ignorant.

I recommend a sentence of 100 hours of civics and legal Youtube to help alleviate you of your ignorance. And 1 hour of berating following a public reading of your comment to a group of female accountants dressed as your mother.