(no title)
thisiswater | 2 years ago
In my opinion there's a kind of Accelerationism going on here, where those who contribute the most to global warming also believe that they will be insulated from the effects, and therefore are the least inclined to address the issue. They're probably not wrong.
That is, those with wealth and power believe in climate change - they just don't care if monsoonal crops fail or northern India becomes uninhabitable. Denialism was always a strategy, not a serious strain of thought.
Eat the rich.
myshpa|2 years ago
You're right, we're growing exponentially in a finite environment.
https://futureearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/great_acc...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Acceleration
I wonder how long it will take for the population to accept that the the need for growth is encoded in our system's very structure, in its financial system that prioritizes accumulation, exploitation, and pollution over sustainability and equality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_overshoot
We're in overshoot. If we were sane, we would work on reducing our consumption, but instead, everybody's just trying to preserve the business-as-usual path for as long as possible, no matter how unsustainable it is.
Maybe we need to start thinking about new ways of managing things.
lossolo|2 years ago
hdjjhhvvhga|2 years ago
seizethecheese|2 years ago
thisiswater|2 years ago
notsound|2 years ago
pipo234|2 years ago
Learned a new word today, thanks. Had to google that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism
Very depressing...
thisiswater|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
belter|2 years ago
ngmc|2 years ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_justice
The “Disproportionality between causality and burden” section makes me sad.
29athrowaway|2 years ago
Who is going to tell people that the concept of tourism does not scale? and the most resources you require, the most inefficient you are?
Not the political authorities, influencers or people admired due to their lifestyle (who happen to be the most influential).
The people compulsively consuming resources should be given some form of mental health support so they stop marsforming the planet.
Izkata|2 years ago
No need really, most (all?) western countries and large swathes of the rest of the world are already below replacement rate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_fer...
Euphorbium|2 years ago
jibe|2 years ago
You are promising devastation to human civilization, but all we have is a hot summer. Even got an end to the drought in California!
If you want to fight climate change, you have to be real about it. Doomsday hyperbole backfires and gives ammunition to people who don't acknowledge that the climate has been warming.
thisiswater|2 years ago
https://ocean.si.edu/conservation/acidification/ocean-acidif...
Effects of Ocean Acidification on shell formation:
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21076
https://www.epa.gov/ocean-acidification/effects-ocean-and-co...
This does not come with a silver lining. Imagine, by rough analogy, the effects on the ecosystem if every bug on the planet began struggling to form its exoskeleton.
swader999|2 years ago
Put it this way, where is humanity suffering from the current hot temperature? Deaths are still far higher due to cold.
We are better off now at these CO2 levels than we were in the past century.
https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields
deanCommie|2 years ago
Where humans grow their food is where they've been growing the same food for THOUSANDS of years.
Industrialization has certainly improved yields and the scale but by and large the spaces we allocate for farming have been chosen because they are optimal for the specific plants we grow there.
Rapidly changing climate means many of these locations will no longer be efficient or effective.
The regions of the world that are becoming more comparably temperate and perhaps theoretically would be the new ideal do not have the nutrients in the soil to be effective.
And anyways as long as the climate continues to evolve rapidly, they will not stay stable for long.
This isn't as simple as "We'll just start growing our food 100 kilometers to the north" and nothing else changes.
xctr94|2 years ago
Do you understand that last ~2C the permafrost melting accelerates climate change out of our control, and that the end result in a post-5C world is that the ozone layer goes to shit because of all that methane?
Do you understand food production shutdowns once we get beyond a certain carbon threshold?
It’s warmer now, but it won’t be very nice when you have to live in a cave because skin cancer will develop so quickly.
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees:_Our_Future_on_a...
vkou|2 years ago
If you want a short answer 'Because even minor temperature variations play havoc with agricultural output. And 1.5 C isn't minor. Nor is it the limit for climate change - it's just the starting point.'
throwbadubadu|2 years ago
wolverine876|2 years ago
I think they are just not facing reality, and that has been normalized by the very effective climate disinformation campaign (i.e., climate denial). People follow the herd, they do what's socially acceptable, and that campaign has made it acceptable enough (which is its goal).
The power lies in that campaign (by the same general grouping that uses disinformation for all sorts of other purposes too). That's what needs to be addressed. Fix that and we fix lots of things.
Exoristos|2 years ago
cdelsolar|2 years ago