The point GP is making is that DJI does not indiscriminately upload every video. The moment it has the chance to associate a VIP to a drone, only then the tracking could start. It’s not like you can detect that during random tests on a new unit.
> there's no way to be sure that every second of GPS-tagged video shot by a DJI drone isn't going into a giant server farm owned by the Chinese intelligence service.
-GP
> The point GP is making is that DJI does not indiscriminately upload every video.
-You
That seems to be exactly what GP is claiming could be happening.
They were concerned about “every second of video” which would fit the definition of “indescribably”.
That's not a straw man. It's a valid threat assessment.
Lots of things get shut down for potential misuse.
One of the many jobs of the security apparatus is to predict which surfaces can be exploited, determine how bad those exploits could be, then firewall off the riskiest threats.
corbezzoli|2 years ago
MichaelApproved|2 years ago
-GP
> The point GP is making is that DJI does not indiscriminately upload every video.
-You
That seems to be exactly what GP is claiming could be happening.
They were concerned about “every second of video” which would fit the definition of “indescribably”.
echelon|2 years ago
Lots of things get shut down for potential misuse.
One of the many jobs of the security apparatus is to predict which surfaces can be exploited, determine how bad those exploits could be, then firewall off the riskiest threats.