(no title)
markonen | 2 years ago
Anyway, I have been wondering whether a headless-oriented SKU wouldn't make sense. Pay for the PoE BOM by jettisoning the video output.
markonen | 2 years ago
Anyway, I have been wondering whether a headless-oriented SKU wouldn't make sense. Pay for the PoE BOM by jettisoning the video output.
mrweasel|2 years ago
"Wireless" speakers (they'd be networks speakers then) / home assistant devices / media players and whatever else should always be attached with a network cable, so just power them over PoE. I'm still annoying that the AppleTV isn't PoE enabled. That's not a device I'd use over WiFi anyway.
m463|2 years ago
I've used "informal" poe where you have a cheap injector/splitter that puts a nonstandard lower voltage over the ethernet.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NRHNPUA
but real poe is getting more popular, poe switches are becoming available and maybe the hat is worth it.
There are also middle-of-the-road solutions:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07TJ3ZNJ4
basically poe splitter that has a usb-c power out for the pi
skywal_l|2 years ago
You could always use PLC to use your eletrical network as a data network. I use that for IP cameras. Unfortunately, I still haven't found a PCL adapter providing PoE power.
stavros|2 years ago
rewmie|2 years ago
I'd be surprised if the majority of RPi's userbase didn't used PoE. Having to cart around a power supply isn't a very attractive option when all you have to do to power the device is simply plugging in a yank-proof RJ45 cable. It's also cheaper as you don't have to buy a charger.
ndsipa_pomu|2 years ago
flyinghamster|2 years ago
skywal_l|2 years ago
I actually though it was the other way around. Having the PI powers other devices like IP cameras.