top | item 37691797

(no title)

monopoliessuck | 2 years ago

Of course they _sell_ a headphone jack adapter. That's the point of removing it.

All the "weatherproofing" and "complexity" talk is just smoke.

discuss

order

Fnoord|2 years ago

Geez, what a negative take on a company who do their best to be environment-friendly.

I got quite some corrosion on the headphone jack of my Raspberry Pi 2B. Not sure why. But either way, these adapters can be bought anywhere, and they'll work on other devices as well. Like I said, I didn't use mine much. Usually Bluetooth with an adequate profile is good enough. I doubt people hear the difference between Bluetooth adequate profile and 3.5 mm in a double blind test.

monopoliessuck|2 years ago

Apple's omission was the same garbage about complexity and space, yet no one in the real world had these problems. Apple is making a killing on Bluetooth accessories and adapters which have a much much higher markup than phones. Do you buy that SD cards or removable batteries were "too complicated" and bloaty for the end-user too?

If you're trying to differente yourself from Apple, it seems like a no brainer to include a jack especially since USB ports are needed for charging, battery case accessories, data transfer etc. all of which can't be done while listening to music.

On top of that, a "wobbly" USB port is like the top issue with phones outside of a cracked screen and an analog port is way more resilient to always being plugged in while in your pocket than any USB adapter ever will be.

My wired headset is going to outlive whatever bluetooth sealed-in battery garbage "works today until it doesn't" too so "environmentally friendly" needs an asterisk.

This is Fairphone playing copy apple. You can like Fairphone and their mission, but giving them a pass here is just playing into marketing bs.

rany_|2 years ago

It is true though, lest we forget that Samsung managed to make the Galaxy S5 IP67 water resistant... this phone meanwhile is IP57 rated, which is actually even worse. If they tell you "it's harder with the headphone jack" that's not a good enough reason either, just try harder; it's not worth omitting when we know it is possible.

Samsung was able to pull this off with the S5 A DECADE AGO:

- removable back

- removable battery

- headphone jack

- SD card slot

- IP67 water resistant

This is an anti-environment moneygrab plain and simple. They omit the headphone jack so that they sell you the solution, which just so happens to be their brand of wireless headphones, dongle, whatever... if you actually like FairPhone you'd criticize them over this bullocks instead of being an uncritical parrot.

maigret|2 years ago

Very often you’ll get a better sound with Bluetooth because the DAC and electronics can be perfectly matched to the specific headphone acoustics.

bigstrat2003|2 years ago

I don't think there's anything "environmentally friendly" about making users have an extra dongle to get basic functionality.