[sirius87]

This is very useful. I always end up Googling vertical align for flexbox.

In a rush, what would help me refresh flexbox knowledge is being able to drag and drop the frog, snapped to a 3x3 grid, and get the flexbox CSS code as output.

Still a very thoughtful tutorial.

(EDIT: The reason I said the above is I've personally given up on keeping up with new CSS stuff. Having written CSS off and on since IE7 days, basically I have no energy to keep css tricks in memory, having lived through hand coding vendor prefix flags and whatever the new Chrome Canary is thrusting down the pipe)

[dsego]

No tricks anymore, not much to keep up, flexbox and grid are the end-game. And for most UI cases flexbox is all you need, it's basically stack/group (or vbox/hbox), so you can arrange items vertically or horizontally. Learn flexbox, it's the most useful thing for layouts that's come to css, and it's really simple, there are options for spacing (gap), justify and align, that's pretty much 99% of cases right there.

[qingcharles]

I need the 1%. I want browser masonry support. Right now only Safari has it baked in properly, the rest I have to code around in a sub-optimal way:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_grid_la...

I think Safari has it because the guy that wrote the spec now works at Apple. Not 100% sure of that, but seems that way.

The code is in Chromium, just nobody ever hit the GO button.

[klabb3]

Nesting of flexboxes can be tricky though – especially when you have elements that fill “the rest of the width/height”.

I’ve found that grids are a little easier to maintain a flat hierarchy and avoid complexity, but the downside is it also doesn’t modularize that well – you need to compose all the cells together, some of which probably should belong in a child “component”.

[krsdcbl]

The 1% are difficult to learn, because you only need them in 1% of the cases ;)