[anodari]

Oil industries should be required to offset the carbon equivalent they extract.

[kyrra]

That's assuming an equal amount of carbon is produced by a given amount of extracted material, regardless of how it is used or processed. That seems an incorrect assumption completely disregards potential processing improvements that would reduce it.

This is why you need a true carbon tax if you want to go down this road, as it would make you pay for the actual carbon you produce.

Applying this uniformly to all manufacturers around the world, along with users of final products (like gasoline) would be very difficult though.

[danaris]

...Maybe, so long as they're "offsetting" with something that's not the near-total garbage the current "carbon offset" industry is.

[akho]

This comment pairs well with this submission: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37660256

[Dudester230602]

And the population should be taxed to cover their losses in case pivoting to renewables runs into any issues.

[onlyrealcuzzo]

Why?

>50% of oil is extracted by oil states like KSA and Russia which aren't going to do that.

You're just going to become more reliant on oil states.

You need to fund realistic alternatives first (which we are doing).

Rome wasn't built in a day. But we're moving in the right direction almost as fast as possible.

It probably took 10-20 years too long to get started moving in the right direction, but we are - solidly - now.

[cowpig]

You can tax imports FYI