Well put. I think the 5% is a combo of "low IQ psychopaths", narcissist and just assholes ("bad people"). The word insane IMO points perhaps to much to inability for rational judgment, while a certain % of 5% is very much aware of their impact. The most dangerous among the bunch are obviously high IQ psychopaths...
steveBK123|2 years ago
Someone will inevitable nitpick my particular choice of word, but "insane" is the general non-clinical description of the category.
Points to high value in making your kids work a bad retail job in high school to build some character & experience this first hand early.
maccard|2 years ago
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=areUGfOHkMA
dredmorbius|2 years ago
My friend shrugged, turned to me, and said, "Welcome to retail".
I've related that to a few people over the years. It's a useful lesson to keep in mind. Much better to recognise this for what it is than attempt to fix, fight, or rationalise it.
Kosirich|2 years ago
It also points that banning access to social networks is a right call until kids get to a (mental/educational) stage where they can judge these things in a similar manner.
specialist|2 years ago
Start thinking about insanity and you'll get pulled down the sinkhole of "what is sane?", "am I insane?", "would I know if I wasn't?"
IMHO, the takeaway point isn't "insane" or "sane". It's more like "Do I have a theory of mind for the person(s) I'm interacing with?" and "How do I have compassion for people who are suffering in ways that I don't understand?"
YMMV.