top | item 37742591

(no title)

Crash0v3rid3 | 2 years ago

Megan made so many assumptions in that article based on a slide and single quote that we can't even see.

How about they actually provide some evidence before making such claims?

discuss

order

mbauman|2 years ago

We don’t know how many assumptions Megan made or even who was testifying and what they assumed or what evidence was presented in court. Yes, that’s problematic.

w1nst0nsm1th|2 years ago

It happens it is actually an evidence or key exhibit, in an anti-trust trial.

She could be surely sued by Google by reporting false events.

So I guess we can trust her reporting.

Crash0v3rid3|2 years ago

What?

Why should I trust her reporting? She gave us zero evidence.

the-rc|2 years ago

Concrete question: how does the query rewriting service talk to the ads DB to do what's alleged?