top | item 37787318

(no title)

nerdwaller | 2 years ago

What is terrible about active storage?

discuss

order

itake|2 years ago

My memory is fuzzy, but...

1. all data flow through the rails app (no pre-signed s3 upload or download links for direct uploading).

2. no support for CDNs (I think newer rails versions added support)

3. blobs and attachments were unnecessary abstractions.

3a. Querying was annoying (extra joins) and easy to add n+1 queries.

3b. In my app, images are moderated and it was unclear where to put the moderation metadata (on blobs? attachments? create a new table? why so many tables?) or `deleted_at` type columns.

4. GraphQL gem didn't support it: https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/issues/1777

dham|2 years ago

1. Rails has had direct upload since it introduced Active Storage. No one has uploaded files through their servers in a decade

2. What do you mean? Point whatever CDN you want at your origin

3. Maybe

3a. Yes

3b. Metadata or a new table

4. GraphQL is the single worst technology that has ever been adopted. We adopted at my company...twice. Twice we made the same mistake now we're stuck with it for mobile clients. In fact we're stuck on the old Graqphl RB gem that used a DSL instead of classes, which also blocks our Rails upgrade. We've been able to revert everything back to good ole Rest for another part of the app. Be cautious adopting technologies of large companies.