[samayylmao]

if you havent used blazor before there are some downsides.

The developer experience with blazor is lacking. Debugging tools aren't up to par with other dotnet SDKs. Hot reload only works when not debugging and only if you don't modify member signatures and a plethora of other conditions. Because of the afore mentioned the feedback loop during development can be slow. The razor editor doesn't support all the helpful actions you're used to with dotnet (e.g. cleaning up unused imports). Sometimes the razor editor gives really bizarre errors and you simply need to close Visual Studio and reopen for the. tk disappear

I dont mind the framework itself but there's a few design decisions that could have been better.

I think there are some good use cases for it though. AOT compilation to wasm is kinda neat for workloads that may benefit from that.

I also think that blazor server might just be the most novice friendly way to get I to web development because it abstracts away much of the web. that being said, the blazor server architecture has a plethora of drawbacks.