top | item 37809457 Weekly reminder that FFmpeg powers all online video 54 points| littlestymaar | 2 years ago |twitter.com 7 comments order hn newest [+] [-] sha-3|2 years ago|reply https://nitter.net/FFmpeg/status/1710440696941809868 [+] [-] hnfong|2 years ago|reply Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/2347/To my knowledge Fabrice Bellard created two of those (ffmpeg and qemu) [+] [-] em-bee|2 years ago|reply neither are maintained by a single random person in the middle of nowhere. more like thanklessly maintained by a group of enthusiasts.but, more to your point (i assume), i suppose they could use more support, especially from large users like google. [+] [-] leosanchez|2 years ago|reply Even YouTube? [+] [-] anonacct37|2 years ago|reply As someone who once had access to internal fleetwide profiling information, yes.There is older evidence based on quirks in encoding. https://multimedia.cx/eggs/googles-youtube-uses-ffmpeg/ [+] [-] extraduder_ire|2 years ago|reply Why would they use anything else? I don't think there's any other software close in terms of cost/features. (unless you count libAV, which is a fork of ffmpeg) [+] [-] tetris11|2 years ago|reply The tweet says yes.
[+] [-] hnfong|2 years ago|reply Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/2347/To my knowledge Fabrice Bellard created two of those (ffmpeg and qemu) [+] [-] em-bee|2 years ago|reply neither are maintained by a single random person in the middle of nowhere. more like thanklessly maintained by a group of enthusiasts.but, more to your point (i assume), i suppose they could use more support, especially from large users like google.
[+] [-] em-bee|2 years ago|reply neither are maintained by a single random person in the middle of nowhere. more like thanklessly maintained by a group of enthusiasts.but, more to your point (i assume), i suppose they could use more support, especially from large users like google.
[+] [-] leosanchez|2 years ago|reply Even YouTube? [+] [-] anonacct37|2 years ago|reply As someone who once had access to internal fleetwide profiling information, yes.There is older evidence based on quirks in encoding. https://multimedia.cx/eggs/googles-youtube-uses-ffmpeg/ [+] [-] extraduder_ire|2 years ago|reply Why would they use anything else? I don't think there's any other software close in terms of cost/features. (unless you count libAV, which is a fork of ffmpeg) [+] [-] tetris11|2 years ago|reply The tweet says yes.
[+] [-] anonacct37|2 years ago|reply As someone who once had access to internal fleetwide profiling information, yes.There is older evidence based on quirks in encoding. https://multimedia.cx/eggs/googles-youtube-uses-ffmpeg/
[+] [-] extraduder_ire|2 years ago|reply Why would they use anything else? I don't think there's any other software close in terms of cost/features. (unless you count libAV, which is a fork of ffmpeg)
[+] [-] sha-3|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] hnfong|2 years ago|reply
To my knowledge Fabrice Bellard created two of those (ffmpeg and qemu)
[+] [-] em-bee|2 years ago|reply
but, more to your point (i assume), i suppose they could use more support, especially from large users like google.
[+] [-] leosanchez|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] anonacct37|2 years ago|reply
There is older evidence based on quirks in encoding. https://multimedia.cx/eggs/googles-youtube-uses-ffmpeg/
[+] [-] extraduder_ire|2 years ago|reply
[+] [-] tetris11|2 years ago|reply