It might not be the most crucial, but it likely has widespread voter support, and it makes it harder for merchants to take advantage of customers. No, it doesn't solve California's homeless problem, but it's a win for consumers.
This comment is a partial example of the fallacy of relative privation. It's only partial because usually when people make it, they go the extra mile to include the thing that they think is more important.
dehrmann|2 years ago
parineum|2 years ago
sowbug|2 years ago
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Relativ...
pingpongchef|2 years ago