top | item 37833467 (no title) throwaway1492 | 2 years ago Well that supports my point actually, that these "short comings" aren't short comings at all if one takes the time to learn the framework. Blabbering? People often say that who have no valid technical or intellectual response. discuss order hn newest RamblingCTO|2 years ago I don't see anything beyond ad hominem. That reveals more about yourself than you probably think. I'll move on then. geodel|2 years ago Why would framework be correct if the premise of heavy runtime reflection based approach itself is bad?You can spend your lifetime learning this framework, others can simply reject on first principles' basis. wiseowise|2 years ago > Why would framework be correct if the premise of heavy runtime reflection based approach itself is bad?Because the framework allows zero reflection approach.
RamblingCTO|2 years ago I don't see anything beyond ad hominem. That reveals more about yourself than you probably think. I'll move on then.
geodel|2 years ago Why would framework be correct if the premise of heavy runtime reflection based approach itself is bad?You can spend your lifetime learning this framework, others can simply reject on first principles' basis. wiseowise|2 years ago > Why would framework be correct if the premise of heavy runtime reflection based approach itself is bad?Because the framework allows zero reflection approach.
wiseowise|2 years ago > Why would framework be correct if the premise of heavy runtime reflection based approach itself is bad?Because the framework allows zero reflection approach.
RamblingCTO|2 years ago
geodel|2 years ago
You can spend your lifetime learning this framework, others can simply reject on first principles' basis.
wiseowise|2 years ago
Because the framework allows zero reflection approach.