(no title)
divtxt | 14 years ago
That's putting it mildly. A split menu may be correct from some design point of view (e.g DRY principle) but from a usability point of view, it's recipe for frustration.
On a more general note, does no one else consider Mac-style "alt-tab switches apps" and "global menu" usability mistakes? (on grounds of being modal)
With both Unity and Gnome adopting these, I no longer have a compelling reason to switch from Mac back to Linux.
Which is a pity really, because Gnome 3 is one of the prettiest and most usable desktops I've seen: I love how the windows key gives you access to the dock, all windows, workspaces and search at the same time.
dfc|14 years ago
Even if you assume that the only thing Linux has to offer is graphical windowing environments; there are a lot of other enviornments besides gnome/unity...
Xfce, awesome, kde, xmonad, lxde, fvwm95(joke), etc....
whateverer|14 years ago
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/38/windows-alt-tab/
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/97/coverflow-alt-tab/
dchest|14 years ago
duaneb|14 years ago
Au contraire, I now consider gnome usable for the first time. The fact that apps didn't really exist but as a collection of individual windows drove me crazy.
divtxt|14 years ago
Note that I'm not arguing against having an app concept or a "switch app" action. The problem is killing the "switch window" action.
batista|14 years ago
No, modal can be good.