top | item 37872306

(no title)

oarabbus_ | 2 years ago

>Because they are? There are whole industries that are more or less total BS. Whatever you do for these companies you are pretty much not contributing anything worthwhile to the society.

Well, according to you maybe. The customers/patrons of the company probably have a differing view.

discuss

order

tomcar288|2 years ago

not necessarily. so many products are bought from a top down approach where the end user is not the decision maker. i mean, how many times has a company's top managers purchased abysmally awful software, taht then needs to be used by it's employees. it happens govt all the time. our school district has purchased subscriptions to an absolutely awful online homework platform: it's clear the designers of this platform didn't do any usability studies. and now all the students and teachers in this district are screwed and forced to use this abomination.

guiriduro|2 years ago

I'm reminded of the way Star Trek explains in the 24th century the Federation doesn't use money[0]. By that yardstick, all jobs whose only purpose is moving or charging rent on money , e.g. the entire banking/finance sector, is pure bullshit waste. I tend to agree. (Not that there wouldn't need to be some efficient algorithmic distribution of resources to maximise human wellbeing, of course; To each according to their need etc.) [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rh3xPatEto

gruez|2 years ago

>By that yardstick, all jobs whose only purpose is moving or charging rent on money , e.g. the entire banking/finance sector, is pure bullshit waste. I tend to agree.

If you think "the entire banking/finance sector" is just shuffling money around, then the problem is that you have a simplified view of what they do, and therefore think their 10% (or whatever) contribution to the GDP is oversized. Banking/finance is far more than what you encounter day to day (ie. retail banking). They also assess risk, make forecasts, and make decisions on how capital is allocated. All of that requires staff and costs money.

>(Not that there wouldn't need to be some efficient algorithmic distribution of resources to maximise human wellbeing, of course; To each according to their need etc.)

Given how DAOs turned out in the past few years, I'm skeptical that'll ever work out.

henry2023|2 years ago

Gamblers and Casino Owners would agree that casinos are essential in our society.

noelherrick|2 years ago

And the biggest casino of all is the stock market.

taeric|2 years ago

This does somewhat expose it isn't just so many people thinking they are in these jobs, it is some many people thinking others are in these jobs.