[c7DJTLrn]

>if China can ctrl c/ctrl v your idea and then pay cheap labour to churn out a clone within a week?

By being protective over our ideas we're admitting that China will do it cheaper and faster than us. Why can't we aim to beat them instead?

[barrysteve]

You want to beat them while giving away your ideas? ... ??? Huuahh?

I don't care about 'ideas', I care about protecting knowledge and high level intellectual work that takes real hard work to generate. "ideas" aren't often worth copy-pasting because they only apply to the person generating them anyway, like connecting a winch to a stuck tractor.

Protecting Einstein's theory generating work and then retaining the scientific offshoot products of his work, like Velcro from the Shuttle program, is what is worth protecting.

China wins because they are willing to work themselves to the bone, for relatively cheap.

We can replace the same tasks with machines, but we're not allowed to cut out working class jobs.

We can near fully machinize agriculture from wheat to plate, machinize mining from ore to metal.

What is 'beating China' in your books? I don't understand how you expect to show your hand and win at blackjack, at the same time... (or even why you would show your hand / give away your ideas for no reason..?).

[riku_iki]

> China will do it cheaper and faster than us

its more they will have advantage while abusing Western IP but still keeping its own intact.