top | item 37942397 (no title) exo762 | 2 years ago We really should rename the link. It is grossly misleading.> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. discuss order hn newest ceejayoz|2 years ago Which part is misleading?Amazon (check) let (check) its drivers' urine (check) be sold (check) as energy drinks (check). mattchew|2 years ago The implication is that Amazon was fully aware that this was happening and didn't care. That's what most people would think "let" meant here.Yes, equivocating over the meaning of "let", the headline is technically true. Like so, so many other technically true but misleading headlines. load replies (5) unknown|2 years ago [deleted]
ceejayoz|2 years ago Which part is misleading?Amazon (check) let (check) its drivers' urine (check) be sold (check) as energy drinks (check). mattchew|2 years ago The implication is that Amazon was fully aware that this was happening and didn't care. That's what most people would think "let" meant here.Yes, equivocating over the meaning of "let", the headline is technically true. Like so, so many other technically true but misleading headlines. load replies (5)
mattchew|2 years ago The implication is that Amazon was fully aware that this was happening and didn't care. That's what most people would think "let" meant here.Yes, equivocating over the meaning of "let", the headline is technically true. Like so, so many other technically true but misleading headlines. load replies (5)
ceejayoz|2 years ago
Amazon (check) let (check) its drivers' urine (check) be sold (check) as energy drinks (check).
mattchew|2 years ago
Yes, equivocating over the meaning of "let", the headline is technically true. Like so, so many other technically true but misleading headlines.
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]