top | item 37958263

RIP to my 8-port Unifi switch after years and years of Texas outdoor temps

41 points| striking | 2 years ago |arstechnica.com | reply

58 comments

order
[+] syntaxing|2 years ago|reply
It’s such a shame what Ubiquiti has become these past 3-5 years. Their product used to be fun and reliable. Nowadays, just feels like corporate greed and just another Cisco. I eventually switched out all my Ubiquiti stuff due to it.
[+] flyinghamster|2 years ago|reply
They've had their rocky moments, to be sure - and I won't hesitate to ding them for making self-hosting obscure. But, you can do so, and they actually listened and walked back their egregious stuff, so I'll give them credit for that as well, and my APs and ERPoE-5 have been rock solid. I've also liked their latest controller software (I run a VM on a ZFS storage backend, so I can roll it back if an update goes sour).

If anyone from Ubiquiti is listening, the fact that I can self-host is a major reason for my keeping my existing gear and being willing to buy more. I'm not keen on trusting my network administration to third-party server access.

[+] 3guk|2 years ago|reply
I think that some of their more recent decisions have been questionable (Unifi Video -> Protect) - but there is still no doubt in my mind that you get a lot for your money, even if you do have to troubleshoot a little bit more than more pro (Cisco et al) stuff...

I'm not sure I love some of the more home automation based stuff as I've not used it - but at least with the Unifi Protect range and the switches / APs I've mostly been happy.

Seems like some of the more vocal people in the Unifi community are angry as they have built businesses around supporting these sort of setups - where I totally understand that a broken firmware update can wreck havoc.

[+] Spaced-Oddity|2 years ago|reply
Why do you say that Ubiquiti has gone the corporate greed route? I haven't been following this.

Seems like they're still dramatically cheaper than Cisco, etc. But they've definitely had a few product flops that didn't make much sense to me.

[+] nkohari|2 years ago|reply
Can you say more about this? I have a bunch of Ubiquiti gear for years and have been really happy with it.
[+] causi|2 years ago|reply
Can't stand Ubiquiti myself. The web interface breaks every convention and I remember constantly running into bizarre problems like not being able to change port forwarding assignments without the devices being online or download benchmarks being exactly half as fast as they should be.
[+] dna_polymerase|2 years ago|reply
I only recently got into Ubiquiti gear, besides availability issues in their store, I have nothing to complain about, but I'm not a hardcore user. What issues do you have with them?
[+] graton|2 years ago|reply
My stuff just keeps on working. So for me I have no complaints. They aren't perfect but I haven't found anything out there that makes me want to switch to something else.
[+] markus92|2 years ago|reply
So what's the go to brand for decent networking gear nowadays?
[+] alexose|2 years ago|reply
Out of curiosity, what brand(s) did you switch to?
[+] beej71|2 years ago|reply
I also found it was just overkill for my home network. And it was a hassle when my controller computer would die and I'd need to sort everything out. Went with a simpler solution with web and ssh interfaces.
[+] Vaslo|2 years ago|reply
Just don’t see this. I’ve bought a random piece of equipment from them each year over the past 6ish years. Never any issues.
[+] hedora|2 years ago|reply
I have an outdoor shaded box with a USW Flex in it. That one box kills them quickly. I doubt it gets over 110-120F, so the root cause is a bit of a mystery. Any suggestions for a more robust model?

The box has a long PoE run and then it redistributes out the PoE to 3-4 other PoE devices. The wattage is well within spec, but they usually drop to 100MBit from 1GBit a few months before permanently failing, so there could be some sort of signal integrity problem or over-driving of the phy, etc.

I'm kind of considering trying a Flex Mini, since at least they're cheaper. (The box is waterproof.)

[+] xethos|2 years ago|reply
Maybe I'm wrong, so confirm by opening your previously-killed equipment and looking for corrosion, but:

> The box is waterproof

to me just means any water (or humidity) that's in the box when you seal it, stays in the box. Maybe add a dessicant that you can replace every few months?

[+] elromulous|2 years ago|reply
I can't really get into my parents attic rn to grab a photo, but very similar install.

I've had a Netgear* switch running up there non-stop since roughly 2000! Have never had to reboot it. Granted, power outages have rebooted it, and I have no way of actually checking its up-time.

*Those were the days when Netgear products were solid

[+] accrual|2 years ago|reply
That's pretty cool. Is it a managed switch? I feel unmanaged switches have an advantage for being relatively simple with no user facing config or startup/backup images. They're basically just an ASIC with supporting hardware to look up numbers in a table and transmit out the resulting port - it could last decades.
[+] sokoloff|2 years ago|reply
> All it took to wire up my garage were some cheap gigabit SFP transceivers (pretty sure I used these ones right here), 40 meters of aqua-clad multimode fiber, and a $75 appointment with a contractor to actually run the fiber.

I'm puzzled as to why someone writing for ArsTechnica would need the contractor to run the fiber. Any idea?

They already said they didn't want to pay to run a conduit and I can't imagine a contractor doing anything at all that involves both a shovel and a fiber run for $75, even 8 years ago.

[+] sumtechguy|2 years ago|reply
> I'm puzzled as to why someone writing for ArsTechnica would need the contractor to run the fiber. Any idea?

Because sometimes you do not want to dig thru insulation and just pay someone for it.

[+] klondike_|2 years ago|reply
The contractor probably only terminated the fiber. The tools to do fiber termination and splicing are much more expensive than $75
[+] accrual|2 years ago|reply
I wonder if putting the switch behind a UPS or more substantial surge protector/line filtering would help it last even longer. The batteries in a UPS at those temps might give up before the switch does.
[+] jensenbox|2 years ago|reply
I am hearing a several people saying "they are moving away from Ubiquiti" but none say exactly what they are moving to or in past tense what they moved to.

What are you all moving to?

[+] newhotelowner|2 years ago|reply
We moved everything from ubiquity to Rakus and Netgear.

My ubiquity switch died right after the warranty expired and same thing with the cloud key. Not only that, every single update crashed my cloud key and had to reset it

[+] nicholashead|2 years ago|reply
Meanwhile, I've had two USW-Lite-16-POE's fail just outside their two year warranty period, alongside a CloudKey and other equipment from them. It's just junk and they don't stand behind it. I'm transitioning away from them as best I can. The only thing I have left is my gateway and some APs.
[+] gurchik|2 years ago|reply
The hard drive on my Cloudkey Gen2 Plus failed less than a year after I bought it. I don’t blame Ubiquiti for a hard drive failure. I blame them for designing the device to be fanless but constantly hot to the touch (44 degrees as I’m writing this, with two 120mm fans right next to it). Countless support posts complaining about poor hard drive lifespan in that kind of environment, but never a response from Ubiquiti or a redesign.
[+] jabroni_salad|2 years ago|reply
If you still want to use SOHO equipment, I like Aruba instant-on a lot. Their APs are just as good as Ubiquiti's and you don't need a separate doodad to control them, the first one you set up can control the others.
[+] moribvndvs|2 years ago|reply
Still got my USW-8-150 laying literally my feet. Dirt and dust everywhere, I accidentally kick it all the time. I should feel bad for having my network equipment heaped in a pile under my desk but hasn’t bothered it one bit. I was always nervous about it because it runs really warm but really it’s been fine.
[+] tekeous|2 years ago|reply
This is why I use Mikrotik. I swear they’re the last brand standing that is actually built tough. Affordable too.
[+] dddw|2 years ago|reply
Mikrotik is indeed awesome
[+] not_your_vase|2 years ago|reply
Do you remember the time when Ars Technica didn't only publish reposts from the Verge, Logitech press-releases, and covid articles but actually posted hands-on technical and sysadmin tutorials (like the original of this switch from many years ago), and did hands-on reviews instead of generating it with a template?

Pepperidge farm remembers (but only very vaguely, it was a long time ago).

[+] dporter|2 years ago|reply
Your comment made me nostalgic so I went to John Siracusa's last macOS review from 2014 (10.10 Yosemite)[1]. Copied and pasted into Microsoft Word, it is 84 pages long, almost 27,000 words, and averages about one image per page. Quality and length are obviously not the same thing, but I can't imagine any online news outlet publishing something like that now.

1: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/10/os-x-10-10/

[+] dualboot|2 years ago|reply
I remember when Ars Technica was a forum with a token website attached.
[+] whalesalad|2 years ago|reply
I have one of these with like 9,945 years of uptime. Rock solid piece of gear.