top | item 37978692 (no title) usednet | 2 years ago Yes. The bottom 1%’s clothing will always be more indicative of the average clothes of the time than the top 1%’s. discuss order hn newest thrwaway1337|2 years ago So what? TFA is not about the working class nor does it need to be. Why this fixation on comparing yourselves with the poor? antihipocrat|2 years ago The article makes a lot of reference to class.Wigs, stockings and heels were associated with being of the aristocrat class. Which, as the article states, could make one wearing such things a target. load replies (1) itjustisthough|2 years ago Affliction Olympics.
thrwaway1337|2 years ago So what? TFA is not about the working class nor does it need to be. Why this fixation on comparing yourselves with the poor? antihipocrat|2 years ago The article makes a lot of reference to class.Wigs, stockings and heels were associated with being of the aristocrat class. Which, as the article states, could make one wearing such things a target. load replies (1) itjustisthough|2 years ago Affliction Olympics.
antihipocrat|2 years ago The article makes a lot of reference to class.Wigs, stockings and heels were associated with being of the aristocrat class. Which, as the article states, could make one wearing such things a target. load replies (1)
thrwaway1337|2 years ago
antihipocrat|2 years ago
Wigs, stockings and heels were associated with being of the aristocrat class. Which, as the article states, could make one wearing such things a target.
itjustisthough|2 years ago