[zegl]

Posts with text like this really grinds my gears:

> chatGPT says that MPTCP has been included in the mainline kernel since Linux kernel version 3.6 and that users can configure and use MPTCP features, but the MPTCP community website says that MPTCP v1 is only supported since 5.6.

Why is it interesting what a GPT has to say about it, if you've fact-checked it and found contradictory information?

[Philpax]

Demonstrating that the tool that many developers may consult first may not be telling the full truth, and that they might need to do more research?

This isn't even that egregious of a reference to a GPT, in my opinion.

[liotier]

At least, it mentions GPT usage. The amount of GPT verbiage passed as human output dwarves those punctilious occurrences.

[ethbr1]

To remind people how unreliable GPT "facts" are?

I'm all in favor of anything that socializes the idea that believing what a GPT tells you is like believing the guy who hangs out at the corner gas station.