top | item 38063504

(no title)

lionsdan | 2 years ago

"In 1997, Congress passed the Balanced Budget Act, a bipartisan effort to cut back on spending. The act put a cap on the number of annual residencies CMS would support, and froze the funding at 1996 levels. . . . Since 2007, a bill to increase the number of residencies has been introduced in every Congress . . . but never passed."

https://www.washingtonian.com/2020/04/13/were-short-on-healt...

discuss

order

lolinder|2 years ago

But why aren't more residencies paid for through other channels?

I wasn't under the impression that medical residents were solely a drain on hospital resources—my sense was they did a lot of the smaller tasks to free up licensed physicians to do more. At some point, if there aren't enough CMS-funded residencies and there aren't enough licensed doctors, wouldn't hospitals just start hiring more residents?

The article you linked to has a heading that touches on this ("how did we end up with Medicare basically determining the number of new doctors per year?"), but doesn't actually answer the question it poses. It explains why the government started funding residencies, but not why the industry is now completely dependent on that funding.

nextaccountic|2 years ago

maybe it's because the industry isn't really interested in having more MDs?