Fascinating. I just skimmed the United States AI regulation executive order and this type of scenario, reputational damage, it does not seem to be mentioned by the United States president's office.
So it's like yet another way that AI can increase risk to business, through reputational harm of a financial entity.
Is there a like a regular law about this kind of thing? I don't think so, implying that that's the poll was produced by the guardian.
The power of suggestion, I guess content might need disclaimers that it's AI generated in order to avoid this sort of reputational harm but you know that would actually be really nice but I don't see that being advocated by any government regulators at the moment.
Microsoft has a licence with the Guardian to publish the news organisation’s journalism. The Guardian article and accompanying poll appeared on Microsoft Start, a news aggregation website and app.
The danger there is that MS ends up only publishing news from outlets who are okay with having this sort of nonsense appear alongside their stories. These would generally be very low-quality outlets. A better resolution for all-concerned (including MS) would be if MS _just stops doing it_.
ncr100|2 years ago
So it's like yet another way that AI can increase risk to business, through reputational harm of a financial entity.
Is there a like a regular law about this kind of thing? I don't think so, implying that that's the poll was produced by the guardian.
The power of suggestion, I guess content might need disclaimers that it's AI generated in order to avoid this sort of reputational harm but you know that would actually be really nice but I don't see that being advocated by any government regulators at the moment.
rsynnott|2 years ago
MacsHeadroom|2 years ago
jjgreen|2 years ago
Well then, there's a fairly easy fix.
rsynnott|2 years ago
richliss|2 years ago