[AYoung010]

That was the most interesting part of the article for me. I don't understand how it can be faster, given that there's syscall translation going on. Is this more of a commentary on the quality of the `libc` available on Windows? Or on the quality of the GNU Emacs Windows port?

[vitiral]

IIUC there is no syscall translation, it's more like there are separate libc implementations and the correct one gets selected at program start based on the OS.

[ReactiveJelly]

So like in-process WINE?

[PrivateButts]

Could be like the improvements seen when running applications using DXVK. My understanding is that sometimes these translation layers can use newer and more efficient methods than the path that a native implement for the time would use. I'm not a subject matter expert though, and could be completely off base.