thanks, yes, there's a lot of pending stuff to be fixed, especially UI stuff. We were more into getting the programming components right and hadnt paid too much attention to the UI, but we hope to give the site a totally new look (with cleaner logo!) by end of next week.
Constructive feedback here...it's not going to be pretty.
This looks like it was made by a developer. That's one of the distinctive factors, I have noticed, with the apps that come out of YC, you can't tell they were made by developers. They are given a nice sheen of design and it looks pleasant and inviting.
This doesn't. As a developer, this reminds me of Java and C++ (both of which make me cringe).
Whereas Ruby feels inviting and less intimidating.
Glad to see you guys doing something and I am not knocking that...it's just that developers are people too. We also want to use tools/sites/apps that feel & look good.
Take some time and invest in UI/UX design...it will go a long way.
Thanks marcamillion, your advice is befitting and makes a lot of sense.
We're already halfway done on a totally new glossy look (themed blue & green) and a much more intuitive UX. This should be up in a couple weeks.
We're a small team of devs with no major funding, so we do the best we can given the resources we have. Our idea was to launch early, launch often and keep fine-tuning along the way. Guess we overshot on the programming effort and left the UX work in a little bit of a backlog.
Btw, for better or for worse, Java and C++ are still the most popular programming languages being used in the industry till recently :) (http://langpop.com/)
Is "The Codecademy for Higher-Level Languages" HN editor embellishment? I fail to see how Programr is for higher-level languages than Codecademy & how it's like Codecademy.
Edit: This is TechCrunch editorialization. My confusion still stands.
[+] [-] latch|14 years ago|reply
http://www.programr.com/sites/all/themes/drigg_theme/img/log...
Hoempage scores 58/100 on Google Page Speed, so there's a lot of stuff that can be done before to compensate for a larger image.
[+] [-] rajeshm101|14 years ago|reply
Rajesh, cofounder, Programr
[+] [-] marcamillion|14 years ago|reply
This looks like it was made by a developer. That's one of the distinctive factors, I have noticed, with the apps that come out of YC, you can't tell they were made by developers. They are given a nice sheen of design and it looks pleasant and inviting.
This doesn't. As a developer, this reminds me of Java and C++ (both of which make me cringe).
Whereas Ruby feels inviting and less intimidating.
Glad to see you guys doing something and I am not knocking that...it's just that developers are people too. We also want to use tools/sites/apps that feel & look good.
Take some time and invest in UI/UX design...it will go a long way.
[+] [-] rajeshm101|14 years ago|reply
We're already halfway done on a totally new glossy look (themed blue & green) and a much more intuitive UX. This should be up in a couple weeks.
We're a small team of devs with no major funding, so we do the best we can given the resources we have. Our idea was to launch early, launch often and keep fine-tuning along the way. Guess we overshot on the programming effort and left the UX work in a little bit of a backlog.
Btw, for better or for worse, Java and C++ are still the most popular programming languages being used in the industry till recently :) (http://langpop.com/)
Rajesh
[+] [-] oconnor0|14 years ago|reply
Edit: This is TechCrunch editorialization. My confusion still stands.
[+] [-] rajeshm101|14 years ago|reply
You can say that Programr is Scratch for industry-in-demand languages, if that sounds better :)
[+] [-] rajeshm101|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paul9290|14 years ago|reply
I'll send you a link to one of our games.
We're launching our preview this week after 7 months of development.
[+] [-] jnotarstefano|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] paul9290|14 years ago|reply
Please email me at ryan <at> codepupil<dot>com - subject "Test" to help us test.
thnx again!
[+] [-] plubiuz|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] amauricio|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] jykang1|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] Abundnce10|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] veyron|14 years ago|reply
[+] [-] rajeshm101|14 years ago|reply
Tks, Rajesh