(no title)
SethTro | 2 years ago
Arstechnica somewhat bridges this gap at the end with quotes including "at these intake levels", "A single serving", "from time to time", "indulging during holidays".
SethTro | 2 years ago
Arstechnica somewhat bridges this gap at the end with quotes including "at these intake levels", "A single serving", "from time to time", "indulging during holidays".
Retric|2 years ago
Arstechnica is really understating the risks here. While global chocolate consumption is 7.2 million metric tons that isn’t split evenly among 8 billion people resulting in 1.8kg/person per year instead the majority of the global population is 0-0.5kg/person and the rest is increasingly concentrated.
It’s not that uncommon to find someone eating a 1.6oz Hershey chocolate bar per day or the equivalent amount in whatever brand they prefer. If they happen to like an unusually high concentration brand the amount on its own might not seem concerning but it combines with every other source in their life and their lifetime accumulation from other sources.
sparker72678|2 years ago
newZWhoDis|2 years ago
Glad to see my Ars ban in 2015 was ahead of the curve, and sad they are still churning out the same garbage that got them blacklisted in the first place.
pests|2 years ago
Count me closer to that 0 number. I can't think of the last time I ate any chocolate. Never was much into sweets or snacking.
> It’s not that uncommon to find someone eating a 1.6oz Hershey chocolate bar per day
I can think of two acquaintances who consume at least that a day.
henearkr|2 years ago
nomel|2 years ago