Regardless of whether or not corruption is the case, it only has forward guarantees if there is a hint of blackmail involved.
Donating a bunch of money to a group gives you no power over that group unless they think there is more on the table. When you’re about to get arrested they will cut all ties immediately unless there is an actual obligation to support you.
To be fair, 90% of all people won't admit they were wrong.
Sidenote, I think HN will be wrong on Elon Musk and X as well over the long term (personal opinion of course). But the way the discourse around X has changed on HN is incredible.
When Parag Agarwal was made CEO, everyone on HN complained about the platform and how a subscription model was the way to go. Now that Elon Musk has instated a subscription model, (seemingly) all on HN agrees he's running the company into the ground.
Seems to be happening a lot more often over the past 4 or 5 years.
If you like HN commentators being wrong, you’ll love this initial thread on Alameda being insolvent [0]. I post only in jest, as hindsight makes much of this hilarious.
Eh, he must be pretty much broke now so why would politicians from either party care about him anymore? He made his donations and they looked the other way on regulating crypto.
His campaign finance trial is March 11, sentencing March 28. I think it’s reasonable to speculate on whether he’ll plead guilty in exchange for clemency at sentencing. Who knows. I don’t think anybody reasonable has ever believed a pardon is on the table for the largest fraud ever.
I don't care either way, but I would guess most people expect that the sentencing to be very light if you have friends in important places.. not that you're just totally let off on all charges.
kortilla|2 years ago
Donating a bunch of money to a group gives you no power over that group unless they think there is more on the table. When you’re about to get arrested they will cut all ties immediately unless there is an actual obligation to support you.
TulliusCicero|2 years ago
xray2|2 years ago
xNeil|2 years ago
Sidenote, I think HN will be wrong on Elon Musk and X as well over the long term (personal opinion of course). But the way the discourse around X has changed on HN is incredible.
When Parag Agarwal was made CEO, everyone on HN complained about the platform and how a subscription model was the way to go. Now that Elon Musk has instated a subscription model, (seemingly) all on HN agrees he's running the company into the ground.
Seems to be happening a lot more often over the past 4 or 5 years.
pityJuke|2 years ago
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33464494
EricDeb|2 years ago
elcritch|2 years ago
StressedDev|2 years ago
MattGaiser|2 years ago
peyton|2 years ago
alsetmusic|2 years ago
unknown|2 years ago
[deleted]
talldatethrow|2 years ago