I read it, and it's an interesting read, but I did not find it made a compelling argument for its revisionist historical narrative. There was lots assumption about what IBM knew or did not know that have no evidentiary basis.
As far as I know it's also been debunked by other historians.
Aloha|2 years ago
As far as I know it's also been debunked by other historians.
soperj|2 years ago