In one of your reproductions of the results from the paper it would spit out random other names from the dataset. But from your description of the Tom Cruise dataset, there were no other names included. Why didn't you give it the possibility to fail in the same way?
tveita|2 years ago
mistermann|2 years ago
I'm thinking this might work because "equals" is always logically reversible whereas "is" is not, assuming the statements are technically truthful.