top | item 38285396

(no title)

dchung333 | 2 years ago

Huh, looking at the other nominees a part of me wonders if it was created by someone else and they just had a child stand in to take the credit. This is incredibly suspicious to say the least but who knows. There's nothing wrong with a parent or someone else helping them but to the extent of this...

discuss

order

tombox|2 years ago

Hi, we had other entries from teenagers with similar skills, so Euan's work is not an outlier:

https://younganimator.uk/winner/1699875806584x29956216420210... (Jeremiah, Aged 14)

https://younganimator.uk/winner/1668441140134x35615750206437... (Nishaan, Aged 17)

ProllyInfamous|2 years ago

Thank you for direct links to these. Winner is obviously much outlierier than these other two "mere mortal" young animators.

Mentally daydreaming, my thoughts flash back to 2002 — back when a simple 16-color, ten second animation (done by a peer at our elite creative arts HS) took days to render [PowerMacG4MDD Rage128 FTW!] and secured this peer artist acclaim from his classsmates, state, and future creative employers.

How far we've come. To where we'll go. Just incredible — can't imagine what the next decades will allow, but looking forward to robotic dumplings/streetfood.

shultays|2 years ago

I hope works of these extremely talented kids were not demotivating for other contenders

dchung333|2 years ago

You're showing the winners not the nominee's its pretty clear what's going on here.

SoftTalker|2 years ago

You could be right; I'd hope the competition vetted the entries. But 16 isn't really a child. There's a lot of variation, but there are a lot of very talented people that age or even younger.

youngtaff|2 years ago

Some 16 year olds are kids some are not… but whether they’re a child or not doesn’t depend on their level of artistic talent / skills

dchung333|2 years ago

Honestly at 16 even if a child reached this skill level it means they typically sacrificed other aspects of there life to reach it. Realistically less than 0.1% of children reach this route and from I've seen it's due to "encouragement" by their parents. I've seen a wide range of people children who had have "gone" far. Kids who finished their PhDs by the age of 16. It's almost always child abuse. There parents don't necessarily hit them. But they "encourage" them by forcing them down a path because it's "good" for them. If you're thinking of going this route, don't. The professors I've talked to kind of just see this as abuse and they will not help these children.