top | item 38354607 (no title) hiharryhere | 2 years ago I doubt it. Here in Australia at least companies with large gov contracts are prevented by gov policy from paying ransoms. discuss order hn newest ceejayoz|2 years ago It wouldn't be the first catch-22 scenario caused by conflicting laws. jacquesm|2 years ago The 'easy' solution is not to let your data leak. load replies (1) tsujamin|2 years ago Out of curiosity what's the source on that? AFAICS there's no clear legislation restricting it (although a lot of talk about such a bill in the future). It is in standard contract terms? hiharryhere|2 years ago Source is a close relative involved in responding to a recent, well publicised data breach.They service several large commonwealth departments and were instructed by them not to pay. load replies (1)
ceejayoz|2 years ago It wouldn't be the first catch-22 scenario caused by conflicting laws. jacquesm|2 years ago The 'easy' solution is not to let your data leak. load replies (1)
tsujamin|2 years ago Out of curiosity what's the source on that? AFAICS there's no clear legislation restricting it (although a lot of talk about such a bill in the future). It is in standard contract terms? hiharryhere|2 years ago Source is a close relative involved in responding to a recent, well publicised data breach.They service several large commonwealth departments and were instructed by them not to pay. load replies (1)
hiharryhere|2 years ago Source is a close relative involved in responding to a recent, well publicised data breach.They service several large commonwealth departments and were instructed by them not to pay. load replies (1)
ceejayoz|2 years ago
jacquesm|2 years ago
tsujamin|2 years ago
hiharryhere|2 years ago
They service several large commonwealth departments and were instructed by them not to pay.