[drawkbox]

Again with the ad hominems and strawman arguments in your shadowboxing diversion...

I knew you wouldn't answer. You fail to even acknowledge evidence, what do you know about it? Nothing. How do you think evidence comes about? Just shows up one day? It takes people researching it and events to happen. Your hypothesis is not even attempting to start to see evidence, never be an investigator with that vibe.

Our discussion on your diversion is done, I know where you stand.

- You like crypto consolidation, you won't even attempt to answer that one.

- You are diverting from the point so far it is laughable now.

- Nick Szabo thanks you.

Admit you are an absolutist not a probabalist. Absolutism to no change is more religious than probability. You sure do preach absolutism.

[CyberDildonics]

You fail to even acknowledge evidence,

You never gave any and you admitted that. That's why it's flat earth level thinking. When flat earthers gain understanding they are no longer flat earthers.

How do you think evidence comes about?

I linked you multiple discussions of people explaining why what you said is wrong, why don't you address those?

It's the same thing again:

Link any evidence that modern 256 bit encryption will be broken. Explain yourself. You haven't done anything except for repeating yourself and getting upset. You haven't given a single link.

Do you think people show up to court and just say that someone is guilty over and over or do you think they show information to explain why something is likely to be true.

All these replies and you haven't given a shred of evidence, do you realize this? Yes or no?