[dodyg]

[flagged]

[throwaway69123]

Why?

[carstenhag]

Studies have shown that more diverse teams are better overall (don't have time to look it up now, sorry. Should be easy to find).

[Aerbil313]

If gender of people influence your decisions in any way you are sexist and a discriminator, period.

[jonbell]

If you know that putting four wheels on a car works better than putting three wheels on a car, that doesn't make you biased against three wheels. It makes you biased towards better results.

We know that "thought diversity" on a team, which can take many forms, has a short term drawback (team gelling doesn't go as fast) and long term advantages (more ideas, better ideas, better resilience, etc etc).

Read up.

[LadyCailin]

That’s like saying adding a wheelchair lift to a building is ableist. By definition equity requires acknowledging and catering towards different demographics in different ways. I guess if you want to be pedantic, it’s discrimination, but in this case, that’s a good thing.

You could also argue that equity is a bad thing, but I wholeheartedly disagree with that. However, your argument is simply logically unsound.

[alkibiades]

lol, or maybe they don’t care about woke virtue signaling

[yieldcrv]

OpenAI? they do. they chose the wrong people, and now they're in damage control mode to something more familiar to the markets without the oxygen necessary to focus on DEI